My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 2016
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2016
>
May 2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:20 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:17:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001364
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It was brought to our attention on 03/09/2016 that 841 Park Ave had new windows being installed and that a new "colonial" <br />architectural detail was also being added. The house has been in progress of repair for the last two years. The owner had been <br />approved for a new porch overhang and had been working on removing and repairing the wood clap board siding. Until recently <br />the front windows had been covered up while the siding work had been on going. It is very evident that these are new windows <br />and not the original wood double hung that are still in place in other areas of the house. <br />I reviewed the file confirming that the COA was only for the porch overhang and nothing more. I called the St. Joseph County <br />Building Department to see what permits had been issued on this property. They confirmed the last permit was for the porch <br />overhang in 2014. The only other permit pulled was an electrical permit dated 2013. The Building Department informed me that <br />they would be sending out an inspector to "red tag" the property as soon as possible. <br />The windows that have been installed look to be compatible with the Jeld-Wen series 2500 aluminum clad wood windows with <br />interior and exterior grids. The same windows were installed at 307 Lamont in February and look very similar. In any event, they <br />are not the same as the wood windows that were there. <br />Please see attached file photographs from March 10, 2016 and those from 2014 to compare what was there to what has been <br />installed. <br />Update 3/17/16 <br />I met with Cole Hay on 3/16/16. He indicated that he would be coming in to apply for the windows and getting renewed RMEs <br />for the siding and porch base rework since the previous RMEs were expired. The project was not red -tagged. I inquired at the <br />Bldg Dept. as to why there was no Stop Work order on the property. The inspector informed the owner that he was doing work <br />without permits and would need to get permits. He never stated "stop work". The other inspector will be going out today to post <br />a "Stop Work" Mr. Hay came in and his application was rejected due to lack of product info of what he is putting in. He said the <br />windows were beyond repair, but made no attempts to document this or to contact us to document the condition prior to <br />performing the work. Guess What? Now we have two brick pillars flanking the property line just inside the municipal sidewalk. <br />This is less than 48 hours old. The cement is not entirely cured. Pictures attached. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />CHAPIN PARK <br />THE ENVIRONMENT <br />B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES <br />This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography <br />and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique <br />to each structure. <br />Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin <br />Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. <br />Required <br />Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as <br />trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such <br />areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such <br />other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with <br />an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the <br />structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the <br />pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. <br />Recommended <br />New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings <br />and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. <br />Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may <br />cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate <br />location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. <br />Prohibited <br />No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements <br />before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into <br />parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The <br />installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas <br />where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a <br />public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be <br />installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential <br />exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. <br />II. EXISTING STRUCTURES <br />A. BUILDING MATERIALS <br />Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In <br />some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. <br />Required <br />Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through <br />repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or <br />replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be <br />maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method <br />acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.