Laserfiche WebLink
4. Walls (siding) have holes, breaks, loose or rotting materials; and are no longer maintained <br />weatherproof or properly surfaced coated. <br />5. Handrails and guards rails are mission or are not firmly fastened, and are no longer capable of <br />supporting imposed loads. <br />6. Windows, door and frames are not weathertight. <br />7. Glazing materials (window and door glass) is cracked or broken. <br />8. Screens are missing and/or torn from openings. There are no approved, tight fitting screens <br />supplied for all openings utilized for ventilation. <br />9. Doors and door hardware are not maintained in good condition. Locks no longer tightly secure the <br />door. <br />10. Basement hatchways are not maintained to prevent the entrance of rats, rain and surface drainage. <br />Comment: Inconclusive. <br />11. Operable basement windows are not supplied with rat proof shields, storm windows, or other <br />approved rat protection. Comment: Inconclusive. <br />An August 9, 2014 Code Enforcement, Order to Comply and Notice of Continuous Enforcement Hearing <br />orders the following: Demolition of multi -unit. <br />Report from Preservation Specialist site meeting with owner, Margaret Jamison August 27, 2014: <br />On 27 August 2014, I met with Margaret Jameson at 315 W Madison at 10 am. She allowed me to <br />remove the boarding from the rear door and enter the house. There is evidence of where someone had <br />gotten into the house and had squatted. There is garbage mainly on the first level and evidence that <br />animals had gotten inside and had soiled in certain spots. I went to the attic and even though it was <br />raining, the deck was dry and no roof leaks were visible. The owner informed me that the shingles were <br />still under warranty. She also informed me that no one, outside of whomever broke in, had occupied the <br />house for almost 10 years. She informed me that she had the electric, gas, and water meters removed <br />years ago as well. I noticed only a few broken windows as she had hired someone to board them up after <br />experiencing the break-in. I walked the entire house and noticed only a definite need to have the clutter <br />removed in order to make a better description of the condition of the floors, etc. I did not notice and <br />bowing, dips, or anything out of square. Upon entering the basement, I saw no evidence of any water <br />damage or any structural damage in the foundation. The large "octopus" heating system looked almost <br />new. I asked the owner about the system and she informed me that the system was installed just before it <br />was all boarded up and locked down. I walked the outside perimeter of the house and garage and noticed <br />no structural concerns that were visible to the naked eye on either. Fortunately, most of the windows and <br />doors were boarded over before any damage could -be done to them. The owner also informed me that to <br />her knowledge no one from code has ever been inside the structure. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />V. GENERAL <br />A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, <br />and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, <br />especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be <br />submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. <br />B. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required before moving any building or structure. The moving of a building <br />within, out of or into the district is discouraged; however, moving is preferred to demolition. Buildings <br />incompatible with existing stnichues in the historic district shall be prohibited. <br />C. Any rehabilitation work shall not be such as to change a building to a style dated previous to its original style. <br />D. In planning rehabilitation projects, an architect or contractor experienced in preservation should be consulted. <br />E. There shall be a liaison committee consisting of five (5) property owners in the district. The committee's <br />responsibility will be to work with the residents of the district and the Historic Preservation Commission (See <br />Appendix D). <br />F. All guidelines will be reviewed and updated, on the recommendation of the liaison committee, at least every five <br />years. <br />