My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
February 2015
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2015
>
February 2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:20 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:16:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001364
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We are proposing that we replace the existing side by side window unit that was damaged <br />due to burst pipes with a single unit so that the bathroom can be expanded to a usable size. <br />That original bathroom was only 28 inches wide and was almost unusable in .its original <br />form. Over the winter a pipe froze and burst and flooded the bathroom requiring the <br />bathroom to be gutted. At this point we felt it made sense to make the bathroom a more <br />appropriate size and more user friendly. To do this we need to take the existing side by side <br />unit and remove the east side to accommodate the new width of the bathroom. I would then <br />like to fill the smaller opening left with a modern casement window that mimics both the <br />exterior trim and the wide muntins found through out the home. This window is going to be <br />almost an exact match aesthetically, while providing much better insulation value and zero <br />maintenance. The existing exterior is stucco which would be repaired where needed and <br />would allow the window installation to look almost seamless and once painted would be <br />virtually impossible to tell that a replacement was ever installed. <br />Due to the tree cover and the southwest corner of the home being the weather side of <br />the home, the window manufacture stated that a wooden window would be a high <br />maintenance item and require frequent upkeep compromising the functionality and the <br />appearance of the window. I am proposing that we use an aluminum cladding that is <br />maintenance free,and visually, appears to be almost the same as a wooden window. We feel <br />that having a maintenance free window that mimics the historic windows on the house is a -- <br />very desirable option to have because it provides the best of both worlds. While it is more <br />money upfront, the energy savings and more importantly the lack of yearly upkeep will <br />prove to be more beneficial to the home as it allows the home owner to spend money on <br />other preventative maintenance on the house as a whole making it much more valuable to <br />the neighborhood. <br />This window is going to be placed on the backside of the home, almost invisible from <br />any view other then the neighbors backyard. There are currently three different styles of <br />window already existing on the back of the home. The window we are proposing to use will <br />actually give the back of the house continuity with the rest of the house and once the other <br />two rear windows are replaced, would allow for the whole home to be consistent in <br />appearance. If you have any further questions or something else I didn't answer, please feel <br />free to contact me at 574-340-1324 and I would be more then happy to answer any <br />questions you may have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.