Laserfiche WebLink
WW-Pxklk Aeern Cmc I' <br />H.dboak m L -4.W, RLlc Aaccss Lacs <br />u'pdasd\o tw_20h1 <br />comrrercialprospect that does not include a <br />conclusion as to recomreridatiohs, policy, <br />decisions, or final action on the terns of a <br />request or an offer of public financial <br />resources; <br />• An orientation of members of the governing <br />body on their role and responsibilities as <br />public officials, but not for any other official <br />action or <br />• A gadering for die soh purpose of <br />admiirstering an oath of office to an <br />individual <br />EvanTle 1: Before a tax neasire is voted upon <br />in the General Asseribly, menbers of the <br />nilJority patty met to discuss to patty's <br />position The meeting is not subject to the ODL. <br />A political caucus is not trarsfomr>ed into a <br />m:etig subject to public scrutiny under the <br />ODL merely because persona attending such <br />caucuses happen to constitute a rrnjority of a <br />governing body. <br />Evanipte 2: A drainage committee decides to <br />met one evening in a troubled area to obtain a <br />fast -hand look at the problem This is not a <br />meeting and is not subject to the law as lone as <br />de committee does no more than inspecttie <br />problem <br />Example 3: A park board decides to make an <br />onsite inspection of its new lake, but it does not <br />givc public notice of its meeting, while at the <br />lake, the board nenhbers decide to appropriate <br />finds for a boat dock. The oro -sae inspection has <br />become a meting and is subject to the <br />requirements ofde ODL. <br />Ecample 4: A majority oftic town board travels- <br />to <br />ravelsto a meting together and readies mecmrt on <br />the outcome of various issues. The board <br />members claim this was not a meting because <br />they were traveling to and from a ' natiorkal <br />meting of town boards. The actions of the <br />board during their travel violated the ODL <br />because the manners took official action on <br />public business and did not simply travel to and <br />from to mecting. <br />Evatnple S: A local cafe is a popular spot for <br />morning coffee, and several members ofa town <br />board are aimrg the regulars. Frequently tie <br />corive sation turns to inners of beat concern on <br />the agenda for the next board meeting. The <br />group discusses the issues and often decides <br />'khat should be dor." Ths discussion violates <br />the ODL if the board rrenbers constitute a <br />nnjoriry of the governing body. By deciding- <br />issues <br />ecidingissues before the meting, the board members <br />have deprived the public of the oppornauty to <br />hear the debate deeding to a decision <br />Example 6: A county council and board of <br />comarssioners gather to discuss the potential of <br />an international company relocating to the <br />county. This is not a meeting so long as tare is <br />no concision as to recommendations, poli}', <br />decisions, or final action on the tents of a <br />request or an offer ofpublic financial resotrves. <br />Example is After the election of new school <br />board timbers, tie school corporation holds a <br />gathering of the board incribers for an <br />orientation of the board on tea roles and <br />responsibilities. During the orientation, the <br />board nimbers set and discuss the agenda for <br />to next meeting. This is a meeting subject to <br />the requuirerrerxs of the ODL because the board <br />took official action beyond just receiving an <br />orientation on teir roles and resporsbiliies. <br />Can a member of a governing body attend a <br />meeting electronically? <br />Oericsally, a member of the governing body <br />who is not physically present at the gathering <br />but participates by telephone, computer, <br />videoconferencing, or other electronic nears of <br />communication may participate in the meeting. <br />The rlernber, however, may not be courted <br />present and tiny not participate in final action <br />What is official action? <br />A group is a govesnshg body and subject to to <br />ODL only if it takes "official action" "Official <br />action"means to receive infommtiar% dclibetate <br />make recommendations, establish polity make <br />decisions, or take final action I.C. § 5.14.15- <br />2(d). <br />Etanrple 1: A city council schedules a meeting <br />to set h rig and firing guidelines for city <br />employees. The meting involves official action <br />kili— Kblic Acttu C— Ix <br />H.&,.km 1—'N <br />—sP blk A— Lams <br />Updasd No ..t. -011 <br />since policy is being established. <br />Evample 2: A inning board hears a presentation <br />from an architectural film regarding the <br />designation of historic preservation areas. No <br />proposals are made nor are votes takcn. Yet, the <br />board does take officialaction because the board <br />is recessing information on public business. <br />Moat is a serial meeting? <br />A serial meeting is a series of small meetings <br />held by a governing body it an attempt to avoid <br />the requiremcahts of the ODL To address this, <br />the General Assembly arrended the ODL in <br />2007 to prohibit a serial meeting. By definition <br />the serial meting law can only be violated by <br />governing bodies of siK or mare idMduals. A <br />serial mcting occurs when members of a <br />goveming body participate in a series of at least <br />two meetings and allof the following conditions <br />are int: <br />• One gathering is attended by at least three <br />mniiers but less than a quorum; <br />• The other gatherings include at least two <br />members oftre governing body, <br />• The sten of different members parti:spatirq <br />at least equals a quorum; <br />• The gatherings concerti to same subject <br />matter and are held within a period ofseven <br />days; and <br />• The gatherings are held to take official <br />action on public busies. <br />For purposes of the serial meting section a <br />member of the governing body atterds by being <br />present it person or by telephonic or other <br />electronic reams, e.xcltding email. <br />What if the need for a public meeting is <br />uncertain? <br />All doubts under the ODL must be resolved in <br />favor of requiring a public meeting, and all <br />exceptions to the ark requiring open meetings <br />must be interpreted narrowly. <br />Ahat is significant about ereruth-e sessions? <br />Executive sessions are sigtiiticant because the <br />ODL permits governing bodies to met privately <br />tinder certain circumstances, "Eeecurive <br />session" is defied in IC. § 5-14-15.2(f) aid <br />mans a meeting from which the public is <br />excluded, except that die governing body may <br />adrni those persons necessary to carry out its <br />Purpose. The ODL sets out the specific matters <br />about whish a public agency can hold an <br />executive session These include iistances Ike <br />govemareru strategy discussions w ih respect to <br />collective bargaining and litigation, interviews <br />Of prospective employees, job performance <br />evaluations, and the purchase or lease of <br />Property by the public agency. For a complete <br />list iqg, see Section Two ofths guide. <br />Ecample 1: A local public works board meets in <br />executive session before considering a tax <br />Proposal because there have been nrmrs die <br />Treasure may be challenged on constitutional <br />grounds. Unless litienion is actually pending or <br />threatened in writing, this is a violation of the <br />ODL <br />Example 2: A bcal school board mets it <br />execurrve session to discuss aikged sexual <br />harassmerr of a fellow enpbyee by a teadher in <br />to district The board calls the teacher in to the <br />executive session to dscuss to eonplairt. Ths <br />is a pernnssrbk exectuicc sessions, so long as the <br />board limits- its action to discussion of the <br />comphiu and does not take ally final <br />disciplinary action agaast die teacher. <br />Evanrple 3: A town board mets in executive <br />session with is attorney and the attorney for a <br />person wha has filed a civil nidus action against <br />the town The purpose of the meting s to <br />discuss sealenxait of the lawsuit. This violates <br />the ODL because de meting includes <br />adversaries. <br />Evanrple 4: A local public works board erects in <br />execlaive session to open bids for a sewer <br />Project. Unless authorized by federal or state <br />statute, or tie bids are class Sed as confidential <br />by statute, to executive session would violate <br />die ODL. <br />Example 3: The governing body of a state <br />agency neers in executive session to discuss <br />records containing trade secrets. Under the <br />Access to Ptblk Records Act, which is <br />addressed in Sections 3 and 4 of this guide, such <br />records are exempt from pubic inspection, This <br />A ~ 1 -'t <br />