My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 2012
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2012
>
October 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:19 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:15:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001363
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS <br />Date: 3 October 2012 <br />Application Number: 2412-1003 <br />Property Location: 701 Pennsylvania Avenue <br />Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate11865 <br />Property Owner: John Morris <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and National Register <br />Rating: Outstanding <br />DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a. two storey wood frame Italianate built upon a <br />stone foundation . It has a hipped roof with asphalt shingles. The walls are clapboard siding. There is a <br />length front porch with wood decking and turned columns; there is a full length rear porch with the same <br />details. The windows and front door have arched openings that splay out at the top and bottom. The <br />windows are 4/4 double hung. There is a double bracketed cornice line with dentils <br />ALTERATIONS: This entire structure has been extensively restored since 2002. The roof is a <br />replacement as are some of the windows. The porches are restorations. Siding has been replaced in-kind. <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: 6' privacy fence in back yard (stockade with dog ear top cut.) Posts will be <br />PT 4x4 set 2 ft. deep in ground with concrete footings. <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to enclose the back yard of <br />his house beginning at the rear set backs of the house and terminating at the sides of the garage. He will <br />be installing a 6' hood privacy fence with 4x4 posts set in concrete. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />B. Treatment <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. <br />Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can <br />potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether <br />on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the <br />appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate <br />of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and <br />style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />C. Renovation and Additions <br />Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing white and addition, is a <br />change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered <br />under demolition (see demolition). <br />Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not <br />cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does <br />not disrupt die visible unity ofoverall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the <br />existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter. the <br />following: <br />1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a <br />way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fencing as it conforms to the Group <br />B standards for Landmarks and will not impact the architectural integrity of the house. <br />Catherine D. Hostetler, Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.