Laserfiche WebLink
PE <br />STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS <br />Date: 28 April 2011 <br />Application Number: 2011-0412 <br />Property Location: 53190 Juniper Road <br />Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate Cube/1856 <br />Property Owner: Joan and Kevin O'Connor <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark <br />Rating: Outstanding <br />DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Alfred Maurice Talley house is a red brick two storey <br />Italianate with side wing additions and an addition at the rear. The hipped roof is covered with asphalt <br />shingles. The windows are double hung 6/6 with brick segmental arch. The front entrance has a panel <br />door with sidelights and transom. <br />ALTERATIONS: The 1875 Atlas illustration shows a cupola, side chimneys in the roof and a porch all <br />of which have been removed. The north wing and the south greenhouse are later additions. The 1975 <br />survey card indicated that the front door with sidelights was probably not original. The rear addition was <br />added in 2007. The entire house was re -pointed in 2005. <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: Rebuild existing sunroom area using existing brick knee wall as foundation. <br />Replace glass/metal frame structure with flat top hip roof and casement windows similar to north side <br />addition. <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Please see attached documentation and drawings. This <br />project will remove an outdated and deteriorating south side one'storey "sunroom/greenhouse" <br />superstructure leaving the brick foundation and knee wall. It will shorten the enclosed room and reveal_an <br />original window obscured by the sunroom. It will be replaced by a wood frame with a flat top hip roof <br />with asphalt dimensional shingles to match north addition and Pella Architect Series casement wood <br />windows with simulated divided lights. The bricks will be re -used to create the planters beneath the <br />northwest windows. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed <br />treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, <br />specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. <br />A. Maintenance <br />The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except <br />for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance <br />of all structure or sites. <br />B. Treatment <br />Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. <br />Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can <br />potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether <br />on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the <br />appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not requirea Building Permit, a Certificate <br />of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and <br />style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />C. Renovation and Additions <br />