My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 2010
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2010
>
October 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:14:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001362
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING*' ! FOR <br />OF APPROPRIATENESS <br /># <br />Date: October 5, 2010 <br />Application Number: 2010-1004A <br />Property Location: 632 Portage <br />Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1902 <br />Property Owner: Pamela and Gary Salustro <br />Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park <br />Rating: Non -Contributing <br />DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a 2 %z storey square building with brick and frame <br />construction. The lower level is divided into two store fronts with plate glass windows and perma-stone <br />facades, the second storey is divided into two apartments with an entrance LaMonte and an entrance at the <br />side yard between 628 and 632 Portage. The second storey is covered with vinyl siding. There is a <br />separate covered entry into each store with aluminum and glass doors. There is a front gable bay area <br />with a central window that has been covered in vinyl siding and two gabled dormers on the south of the <br />roof. The roof is hipped with three tab asphalt shingles. The windows are aluminum and doors at the <br />sides are metal security doors. <br />ALTERATIONS: The building's store fronts were remodeled .in 1952 and 1955. The doors, windows, <br />siding and roofing materials are not original to the structure. <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolish Building. Outlived the usefulness of a commercial building. No <br />parking available. We will level the building and landscape, minimally with grass. <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Demolition of the building then landscaping the vacant <br />lot. <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />V. GENERAL <br />A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, <br />and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, <br />especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be <br />submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. This is a non-contributing 4,856 square <br />foot (excludes basement) commercial/residential building that had a fire on the second floor in 2010 that <br />has caused extensive damage to the roof system and the structure. Per the insurance company there is no <br />access permitted to the second floor or the damaged half of first floor. This building is situated at an <br />angle on the corner of LaMonte and Portage; there are no dedicated parking spaces for either the tenets or <br />commercial interests and their patrons. A variance for the required 5 spaces for a commercial structure <br />was declined in 2010. In 1902 there was enough foot traffic in addition to mass transit from the <br />surrounding neighborhoods to sustain both commercial concerns; that is not the situation today. The <br />building is not viable raider the current Code as a commercial structure as it lacks the necessary parking, <br />or as a residential structure as it also lacks the required second floor emergency egress. The estimated <br />rehabilitation costs from the owners' insurance company is about $201,000.00 which is more than double <br />the structure's assessed value on the tax roles of $94,600.00. This is a large structure on a very small, <br />awkward comer lot in what is now a residential area that no longer supports a mixed use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.