My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
December 2010
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2010
>
December 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:14:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001362
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS <br />Date: December 6, 2010 <br />Application Number: 2010-1206C <br />Property Location: Angela Street Bridge, Angela Boulevard and Riverside Drive Intersection <br />Riverside Trail extension to the crest of Riverside Drive Hill and along the eastern boarder of Brown <br />Field Park. <br />Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Angela Bridge: Filled Spandrel Arch Bridge/1940/W.S. <br />Moore &F.J. Miller, Engineer/H.L. Maddocks Builder <br />Property Owner: City of South Bend (Streets) and St. Joseph County (Bridge #211) <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark (Bridge) Riverside Drive LHD (path to crest of <br />hill and reconfiguration of Riverside Drive to the west; addition of sidewalks in Brownfield Park) <br />Rating: Outstanding (Bridge), Local Historic District (Riverside Drive) <br />THE ANGELA BRIDGE: <br />DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Angela Bridge is a three Arch Melan Style Bridge <br />constructed of reinforced concrete, having two central pillars with corbelled string coursecones at pillar <br />bases and plain spandrels. The bridge construction method relied on bands of several metal arch rings <br />aligned evenly with the protection of a concrete shell. Rough faced cut stone comprises the facing of the <br />structure. <br />ALTERATIONS: COA#2003-0616 allowed for the replacement of the original, deteriorated approach <br />railings with railings of identical shape size, dimensions and design as the existing except that for NHTSA <br />standards new rails will be 12" deep (wide) instead of 9", the piers will be 18" wide and the distance <br />between elongated oval openings in the rail will be 18" on center instead of 12" on center. Openings in <br />both the approach and the guard rail shall be elongated ovals as in existing rail. Conduit and wiring for <br />restored historic lighting is permitted. <br />APPLICATION ITEMS: Roadway Improvements adjacent to District. <br />DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT; The city will be upgrading the lights on the Angela <br />Street Bridge. This work was approved by Historic Preservation in June 2003 under the permit <br />application 2003-0616. The Certificate of Appropriateness has been included in the information Package. <br />(Exhibit A) The City of South Bend proposed to install a total of eight lights on the Bridge: 2 at each end <br />and 4 in the middle where the arches come together on existing pillars. (Photos 1&2) The Main Street -A <br />luminaires will be set upon 12 foot Leesburg straight fluted shafts. (Exhibit B) <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: <br />Group B Standards: <br />A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct <br />physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall <br />encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. <br />B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style <br />or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a <br />change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of <br />any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if <br />it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a <br />Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the <br />proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.