July 2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Meteiver: To what ever site it goes to, but Todd is right to landmark the entire site again, land and all structures is a good idea. Zeiger: I think that at some point this could go commercial, maybe not 10 years from now or 20 years from now, but then we've got parking issues to do and sign problems to deal with and so that's my concern. Klusczinski: And then that house will be in the landfill despite this good faith effort in trying to relocate and use it right now. Zeiger: As far as giving up on this corner, I understand their desire not to deal with us on new construction, that's fine. But I think that it's important that we have that historic review on that new site. Klusczinski: Would the applicant be in favor of helping us landmark or re -designate the new site location? Davey: We're talking about the 90 x 260 right? Various Commissioners: Mm-hmm. Zeiger: All we're doing is replicating what we'd done before. Davey: I think that we'd be ok with that. Riley: I have a question, what about his letter that we have from John Oxian from 2001 removing the landmarking of the land. Klusczinski: That's essentially what we're doing right now so that they can pick up the structure and... Hostetler. It's not the same address. Klusczinski: It's an example of a precedent from another case. Riley: Alright. We make things complicated. Klusczinski: Although we really don't try to do that. So for the record, you're willing to make the 4`" concession and ask us to re -landmark the new site where the house will be located after it's situated. No objection to that. Hackett: Right and then the release of the previous landmarking on all of that other land? Klusczinski: Right. You have all of that Counselor? Meteiver: I think so! Klusczinski: If there's no other discussion then we move to public hearing. Is there any member of the public wishing to speak in support of the current petition? Hearing none. Is there any member of the public wishing to speak in opposition of the current petition? Also hearing none, Chair closes public hearing. Any final thoughts, Commissioners? Do I hear a motion? Zeiger: I'll move for approval of 2008-0710 as amended and recorded and presented. Klusczinski: Thank you, motion has been made is there a second? Chase: Second. Klusczinski: Motion has been made and seconded. Anything final? All in favor? (Ayes are heard) Opposed? (Silence) Motion carries by 5-0. Moved: Zeiger Second: Chase To approve 2008-0710 as amended Approved 5-0 Application Number: 2008-0715A Property Location: 221 East Navarre Property Owner: Erin and Fred Helman Landmark or District Designation: River Bend LHD Rating: Contributing STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT: This clapboard and shingle bungalow was built in 1911 by Hammond and Whitcomb who sold it to William Schindler in 1912. Mr. Schindler used it as a rental property until he sold it Earl H Arnold. Bess and Earl Arnold lived there until 1960. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install wood grain texture siding on dwelling. "Furnish and install vinyl textured —wood grain clapboard siding Colonial Ivory in color over old wood clapboard. Install vinyl shakes over wood 13