Laserfiche WebLink
Hostetler. Well, its just going to come out to here, where this sidewalk meets the major sidewalk. <br />It's not going to extend that far out. It's going to give them the pitch that they need. <br />Zeiger: I don't want to belabor it too long, I'm just... visually, when you build a ramp that's 30 in <br />off the ground, and you add a 4ft railing on top of that, you've got a 7 ft wall essentially going up <br />and coming out past .... when you come out past the porch, that railing is going to have to be to <br />Code and when you add height for the ramp its going to start to get pretty... <br />Hostetler: The neighbors' fence right here is 6ft. <br />Zeiger: That's not a 6 ft fence. <br />Klusczinski: It's probably about 4. <br />Hostetler: If you were over here, there's a lattice type of an affair that's not painted if you stand <br />there, it's like this (gesturing over her head). <br />Zeiger: I'm not worried about the back yard. This is the area I'm concerned with. Thank you, <br />that's what I wanted to point out. <br />Patrick: Would you have any recommendations with any of that Todd? <br />Zeiger: Not that we can answer without the applicant. <br />Klusczinski: I would like to amend the application items for the Edgewater Place standards. I <br />agree with everything that staff inserted for that. However, according to the particular guide book <br />for this district, a handicap or access ramp falls under new construction and new construction <br />guidelines were not included on the report; particularly: building materials in new construction. <br />`Required: Exterior materials on new structures shall be compatible in type, scale, texture and' <br />color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate <br />to the existing or the original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure shall <br />be retained so that the addition could be removed with damage to the basic structure and <br />appearance of the building'. And then there are some other allowances. I think that speaks to <br />materials and to scale and some of the other things for new construction for a feature that was not <br />previously available there. Any other questions for staff? Onward to Commission discussion <br />then. Does anyone have any thoughts or comments beyond what we've entertained? <br />Chase: It probably would be good to ask them before they get their C of A what they... <br />Hostetler: They were going to put in a wooden one, but they realized that the maintenance issues <br />with weeding underneath it and keeping it clean and try to do anything in that narrow of a space, <br />so they went with a more solid concrete construction so that they wouldn't have to deal with that <br />issue. <br />Klusczinski: Unless maybe they poured a pad on the bottom side to keep the weeds out and then <br />built up from that. Do we have any precedent or any other experience for handicapped ramps or <br />anything like this in this particular district? <br />Hostetler: No. <br />Klusczinski: Ok. <br />Zeiger: Is there any other thought to offer the applicant, I think that it is one inch to a foot but I <br />believe that there is a length limit that you're allowed to go without a landing. You're not <br />supposed to go much farther than I thought, it was 12 feet. Don't quote me on that. Check on <br />that. I think you're to go a certain run, and then land for four feet, then you go up a run and a <br />land. That way if you had someone and they got out of control then they'd have an opportunity to <br />stop. That being said, that just pushes that ramp further out, so there are just some issues that <br />need to be worked on this. I'm a little concerned that it's going to have, I mean, I'm not opposed <br />to the ramp; I know that's important to have. I'm just concerned about visually what that's going <br />to look like, especially in concrete. It's not going to be easily remedied if it's not done right. <br />Klusczinski: Then should we consider that it may be appropriate to table this particular C of A <br />until we can discuss it with the petitioner either at the next meeting or at another time to iron out <br />their details. <br />Chase: Did they state an emergency to get this done quickly? <br />Hostetler: It's not an emergency. <br />Chase: Ok, then tabling would be ok. <br />Hostetler. I don't know when they wanted to get it done. <br />Klusczinski: And unfortunately we can't ask them that. <br />7 <br />