My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
January 2008
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2008
>
January 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Klusczinski: Professor, would you be willing to withdraw this particular CofA that is a <br />point of contention and submit one with the encapsulated glass panels that can be retro- <br />fitted into your windows? <br />Enderle: Well, if I come to the conclusion that solution is not as good as the Marvin <br />windows what should I do then? <br />Zeiger: Submit the proof. <br />DeRose: They haven't voted on this one so you could re submit. <br />Rodes: I think what we could look at having another continuance with another holding <br />of the sixty day limit during the continuance. <br />DeRose: I would suggest that you withdraw this petition. <br />Klusezinski: This one will get messy, because this is nothing that we are supposed to <br />look at as far as information, appearance or.....And, I don't think, there's no time issue, <br />that I am aware of, in submitting a brand new CofA. You have the clock restart the same <br />way as you would a Continuance. <br />Enderle: Well my point is that if I go for restoration of sashes with double panes before <br />I make that decision I want to know how much does it costs and what's the quality. <br />That's why I am in favor of a Continuance. If I come to that conclusion you know, I <br />make the proposal; if I don't come conclusion, well, what should I do? <br />Klusczinski: With a Continuance, I'm not sure that its, that we have a fair time <br />advantage on considering it. <br />Rodes: Well, if you Continue this then if we find the alternative is acceptable then we <br />withdraw this and put in a petition for the alternative. If we find no acceptable alternative <br />than this will be before you another time. <br />Enderle: If I give up this... <br />Klusczinski: Any other questions for the petitioner? <br />Zeiger: I am curious as to our legal counsel's opinion after hearing all of this. <br />Rodes: I was saying that we Continue this for another month that between now and the <br />next month's meeting we come up with an acceptable alternative than we can withdraw <br />this and put in another one. That seems to me... <br />DeRose: As long as you waive, as long as the Commission still has the power retains <br />their jurisdiction over this application doesn't get stuck with the sixty day.... <br />Rodes: We hold the sixty day limitation from the last meetings and if we Continue it we <br />hold the sixty days until next time. <br />DeRose: There is certainly nothing illegal about that, you can do that if that made sense. <br />to you all. <br />Klusczinski: Are there any disadvantages to that? <br />DeRose: No, not really. <br />Zeiger: Do we have to outline what these alternatives are that we're expecting to be <br />looked at? <br />DeRose: What he would do, I would think, would be to provide you with another C of <br />A, a second C of A. <br />Rodes: Another acceptable alternative... <br />Zeiger: There are at least two that I would like to see demonstrated as alternatives. And <br />I guess what I am asking is do we have to specify what those are or do we just work with <br />the applicant in between now and then? <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.