Laserfiche WebLink
wishing to speak in opposition of the current petition? Also seeing, hearing none, chair <br />closes public hearing. Would any one care to make a motion? <br />Riley: I make a motion that we accept this proposal as presented... application 2008-0117. <br />Chase: Second.. <br />In a motion made by Linda Riley with a second by Mary Jane Chase the Commission voted <br />to approve COA 2008-0117 with a unanimous vote of 6. Lynn Patrick recused herself <br />because there was a quorum. <br />VJusczinski: Continuance of Certificate of Appropriateness 2007-1107A. Catherine could <br />you re read that for us, please. <br />Hostetler: Sure. <br />Application Number: COA# 2007-1107 <br />Property Location: 710 Park Avenue <br />Property Owner: Georges Enderle <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Chapin Park LHD/NR <br />Rating: Outstanding <br />STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE(HISTORIC CONTEXT: This <br />Eclectic Italianate was built for Mary Chapin Anderson and Andrew <br />Anderson between 1875 and 1877. Four generations of the <br />Anderson -Du Shane family lived in this house until 1962. This is one <br />of the most significant residential architectural structures in the city of <br />South Bend and in Chapin Park. I <br />APPLICATION ITEMS:. Four Marvin replacement windows in the bay area, <br />wood ultimate insert double hung, double pane, upgraded to Low E 11 with Argon <br />gas. Per letter and specifications submitted. <br />RECOMMENDATION: Staff can not recommend approval as the windows are not <br />deteriorated beyond repair and can be restored in-situ in this significant architectural <br />landmark. These are the same windows that were applied for in COAs 2006-1108A and <br />2007-0905A which the Commission denied. <br />Klusczinski: Thank you. Members of the Commission, we are under a continuance, for <br />those of you who did not attend the meeting on November 19, 2007, we were unable to <br />take action. We had two that abstained from the vote, we had two that voted in the <br />negative and two that voted, in the affirmative. We took a couple of passes at it and <br />arrived at the same results. We typically would have'taken action at the December <br />meeting; we were asked by counsel representing the petitioner to hold off so that he could <br />review the case and make a presentation to this commission. In doing so, they waived the <br />60 day period that we normally would be obligated to act within. So, tonight, we are here <br />not to hear public testimony, since we have already done that part', you are going to have <br />