My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
August 2008
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2008
>
August 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:18 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hostetler: Yes, on this part of the property. He just wants to completely enclose it for security <br />purposes. <br />Chase: And there's no problem being on two separate...? <br />Hostetler: No. I checked with the Building Department, they're good with it as well. <br />Zeiger: What's the height of the chain link? <br />Hostetler: 6 feet. <br />Zeiger: 6 feet? <br />Hostetler: It's just going to be a regular standard chain link fence to match the one that's there; <br />it's not going to increase in height. <br />Klusczinski: So are you sure it's 6 feet? <br />Hostetler: The stockade fence will be 6 (ft), but I don't know about the chain link, I'm assuming <br />that it's going to match up with the rest of their chain link fencing. <br />Klusczinski: Other thoughts? <br />Riley: I have a question of Lynn, is that appropriate now? You're in that District... <br />Patrick. Yeah, this is consistent with what's going on there. If I'm correct, this is this big green <br />house that's empty and it's real close to his business. I'm assuming that the stockade in back will <br />help give him some privacy there from the alley. I don't think that they neighbors would have <br />any problem with it. You can see from the pictures that he's given that it's going to come off of <br />the back of the house so it's not going to be on the front on Lincoln Way. It is a large lot. <br />Zeiger: But they're fencing this empty lot to the side of the house. <br />Hostetler: Right, he's buying that on land contract. <br />Zeiger: So that fence will go along that front, at the set back of the house, 6 feet tall? <br />Patrick. Mm -hmm. <br />Hostetler: Chain link, right across there. <br />Patrick: He also has a dog; he might want to have his dog out there. Though he hasn't told me <br />that specifically. <br />Riley: There doesn't appear to be any fence in the front which they mentioned. <br />Hostetler: No, there isn't one, that's why he wants to put on there. That's why they want the <br />chain link there. <br />Klusczinski: Any other questions? In that case, we move to public hearing. Any members of the <br />public wishing to speak in support of the current petition? Hearing none. Any member of the <br />public wishing to speak in opposition of the current petition? Also hearing none, Chair closes <br />public hearing. Any additional thoughts, Commission? Hearing none, is there a motion? <br />Chase: I'll make a motion that we accept 2008 -0606 as presented in the C of A and the <br />recommendation of staff. <br />Riley: Second. <br />Klusczinski: Motion has been made and seconded, without amendments. Any additional <br />discussion? Hearing none. All those in favor? (Ayes are heard) Opposed? (Ayes are heard) <br />There are two in opposition. Timothy Klusczinski opposed. There isn't sufficient information <br />without the petitioner being her a to represent this particular case and to answer questions to make <br />sure that the height of the fence would be reflective of what the District standards would be. <br />Hostetler: He has to get a building permit for it. So it would have to confer to building... <br />Klusczinski: That's not necessarily C of A or guidelines. <br />Zeiger: I don't feel that a 6 ft chain link fence in the front is in keeping with the guidelines. <br />Hostetler: But it is. <br />Klusczinski: The C of A passes by a vote of 3 -2. <br />Moved: Chase Second: Riley <br />Moved to approve 2008 -0606 Approved 3 -2 <br />Zeiger, Klusczinski opposed <br />Application Number: 2008 -0703 <br />Property Location: 521 River <br />Property Owner: Neal Nowak <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.