November 2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

244 Mary Jane Chase: Well in the previous on it just went up to 1900, so... 245 Tim Klusczinski: Just as a point of clarification, I am pot sure that legally that it's pc^ 234 Joann Sporleder: I don't have any real discussion, but I asking this question 235 to Catherine and Amy. .wrongly, I am sure, often when we have the historical information 236 about it brings us up to the present and in these cases it doesn't in 237 either case, but our staff people aren't here to respond to that I was 238 just curious as to why the historical context hasn't been brought up 239 to date, so to speak. In many cases it has been, but in this case it 240 hasn't. 241 Tim Klusczinski: I see. 242 Jerry Ujdak: Make a note of that. 243 Tim Klusczinski: I will. 244 Mary Jane Chase: Well in the previous on it just went up to 1900, so... 245 Tim Klusczinski: Just as a point of clarification, I am pot sure that legally that it's 246 particularly relevant unless it does somehow manipulate the 247 application I not sure that it does in this case, but I will bring it up 248 to Catherine and Amy. 249 Joann Sporleder: Well, sometime subsequent owners are significant in some way, 250 that's my feeling any way. 251 Tim Klusczinski: Very Good, any other discussion? Hearing none, Chair entertains a 252 motion. 253 Lynn Patrick: I motion that we approve certificate of appropriateness number 254 2007-1029. 255 Tim Klusczinski: Is there a second? 256 Mary Jane Chase: Second. 257 Tim Klusczinski: The motion has been made and seconded to approve and other 258 discussion? Hearing none, All in favor? 6Ayes. Opposed? 0 259 Motion carries unanimously. Thank you very much. 260 Mark Bruneau: Thank you very much for your time. 261 Tim Klusczinski: Typically there will be follow up from the staff. Application _262_ number- 2007-1107. 263 STAFF REPORT 264 CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A