My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 2007
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2007
>
May 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:13:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Joan Downs-Krostenko: My name is Joan Down-Krostenko and Ilive at 849 Forest Avenue, South <br />Bend, Indiana. I am a member of the Chapin Park Historic District Board, the Near Northwest <br />Neighborhood Board and the Portage Avenue Steering Committee Board. I have a Ph.D. from the <br />University of Michigan; I am a professor at MO and an architectural historian. <br />I stand here tonight to voice my support for bestowing landmark status on Marquette Primary School. I <br />address myself not only to the Historic Preservation Commission but to the members of the public and the <br />School Corporation who are present here tonight... <br />Many points can be made regarding the benefits of preserving, refitting and renewing an existing historic <br />school building. <br />Among these points is the one proven to be fact more than 600 times in Chicago, namely that it is cheaper <br />to renovate than rebuild. In the last decade the CPS have embarked on a massive school rehabilitation <br />program and saved more than 600 of their 19 and early 20 century schools from the wrecking ball, <br />primarily because it was that restoration would cost less than half of new construction per square foot. <br />What kind of message do we send when we over spend, and spend over and over, to buy a new product (a <br />school)? What kind offuture citizens are we cultivating when we say with our actions that all things are <br />considered things eternally replaceable? Are we declaring our fiscal responsibility? Are we loading up <br />the land -fills with ourpast with the broken remains of buildings constructed and designed by craftsmen in <br />order to line the pockets of contractors and consultants? <br />What kind of message do we send our children when we do not conserve and preserve our architectural <br />patrimony? What institution is more central to a child's experience ofpublic life than their school? The <br />preservation of a school is a message of conservation of energy, tradition, community and history. It is a <br />way of showing respect for the efforts and energies of those came before us. It is a way of saying we <br />value and respect our own talents and endeavors and expect them to be similarly lasting. <br />Everyone knows that historic preservation stabilizes and enhances property values. Progressive and <br />economically vital areas have been preserving and conserving for 50 years. No one in San Francisco or <br />Boston was bulldozing 19 and 20 century buildings in 1960, why are we considering it today? <br />The Montessori curriculum can be implemented in any kind of educational space. While certain features <br />of space and light and other practical amenities are useful, there is no stipulation that I know of which <br />says that Montessoris are only successful in classrooms and other educational spaces of restricted <br />specifications. Marquette School can be refitted to serve a Montessori Academy, something which will <br />indeed make a fine contribution to the magnet school line up here in South Bend. , <br />President Klusczinski: Thank you. Any other members of the public wishing to speak in <br />support? <br />Jerry Niezgodski: Hello, my name is Jerry Niezgodski and I reside at 2930 Bonds Avenue, here in <br />South Bend. I am just echoing what the previous speaker. just said. If Chicago can move forward <br />rehabbing over 600 schools there is no reason why can not do the same here in South Bend. I am <br />particularly concerned that the building that they would replace it with would have a life expectancy of <br />70 to 80 years which is already the age of this school, and this school is structurally sound. And I would <br />also suggest, that if the school corporation would seek out the gentleman from the firm in Chicago and <br />have a presentation from he and his firm regarding how they have been able to do what they have done in <br />Chicago and see some of the dramatic photos of before and after of school that had been abandoned for <br />10, 15 years and yet were still rehabbed. Marquette is structurally sound. Yes it needs work, but it will <br />last a lot longer than what we can do for new. I understand the corporation's desire to have all options <br />open but it is imperative that we preserve what is left. We've destroyed too many buildings especially in <br />the school corporation in the last decade. Lincoln School after all the work the Rotarians did to see that <br />destroyed was a sad day, as far as I am concerned. And, I think again we are setting a wrong example for <br />our youth: Everything's gotta be new, everything's gotta be now. Well, new isn't always better and I am <br />100% in favor of this Commission granting landmark status to Marquette School and to preserve the <br />Northwest side of South Bend and the integrity of the neighborhood and the integrity of the building and <br />the integrity of all those who live around Marquette School. Thank you. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.