Laserfiche WebLink
Choitz: Which was that, that we would ok... <br />Klusczinski: ... that we would receive it into <br />Choitz: That we would receives it as it is. <br />Sporleder: Second. <br />Klusczinski: Any Commission discussion on this? <br />Sporleder: I have one question that I would like to pursue since he did go to the trouble <br />of ascertaining through the realtor, etc. I have thought that all of our local historic <br />districts and local landmarks were to be keyed into the auditor's office and recorder of <br />deeds, so that should have been flagged. If that's not happening, then we need to be <br />aware of that. If its not, he really isn't responsible for not knowing that because the <br />transfer of deeds etc., is where that is supposed to be caught, and if its not there than it <br />may not have been caught by the building department either. <br />Hostetler: The Building Department has, and he didn't apply for a building permit <br />either, uh but the Building Department has a listing of everything that we have in the city <br />and in the county. We're currently working with, and there's going to be an intern hired <br />by the data processing, the IT company, that's doing all of the new certification work, <br />countywide and citywide for both area plan and the building department that's putting all <br />of our information on the system. They would not put it on the tax system because it did <br />not relate to taxes. We tried to get it on that. They said no, that's just for property tax <br />information, so now we're going this route so that would mean that as soon as anyone <br />applies for any time of building permit, that it will flash up there that it's a historic <br />district or a landmark, and that should be done by the end of this year. <br />Klusczinski: Any other discussion? <br />Zeiger: Just to suggest that maybe we need to make signs for either end of the street that <br />say that it's a historic district bigger. <br />Pfeil: They're marked, in other places, but they're not marked on Lincoln Way. <br />Zeiger: There's a sign on Lincoln Way isn't there? It says "Welcome to Lincoln Way <br />Historic District" or something. I call for the question. <br />Klusczinski: Question has been called. Is there a second. <br />Zeiger: Its been seconded. <br />Klusczinski: But not the question. <br />Chase: I second it. <br />Klusczinski: All in favor? (Ayes are heard) Opposed? (Opposed is heard) Ok. <br />Herdman: Mr. President, may I ask a question? On previous votes, where there was a <br />dissenting vote, it was legal counsel's opinion that the person must speak into the record <br />the reason for their dissenting vote. <br />Klusczinski: Lynn, would you be able to offer... <br />Patrick: Yes, this Certificate of Appropriateness is submitted on work that's already <br />completed, though it's incomplete. There are no photos of the completed work presented <br />with... are those the current windows or those that have been redone? <br />Hostetler: 2005, and 2006. <br />Patrick: Back of the home, September 2005, side of the home 2006. Which of these have <br />are the ones where the windows have been replaced? <br />Hostetler: All of those except the ones in the dormer. <br />Patrick: These have all been replaced? <br />Hostetler: They're storm windows, all storm windows. <br />Patrick: Uh-huh. <br />Hostetler: Wayne didn't take the pictures. <br />Patrick: So my original statement is that I'm denying- being presented this, I was <br />expecting some kind of photos of the work <br />Sporleder: Can I comment on that? I thought that the Commission itself was presenting <br />this CofA. <br />Hostetler: No. <br />3 <br />