Laserfiche WebLink
234 Joann Sporleder: I don't have any real discussion, but I asking this question <br />235 <br />wrongly, I am sure, often when we have the historical information <br />236 <br />about it brings us up to the present and in these cases it doesn't in <br />237 <br />either case, but our staff people aren't here to respond to that I was <br />238 <br />just curious as to why the historical context hasn't been brought up <br />239 <br />to date, so to speak. In many cases it has been, but in this case it <br />240 <br />hasn't. <br />241 Tim Klusczinski: <br />I see. <br />242 Jerry Ujdak: <br />Make a note of that. <br />243 Tim Klusczinski: <br />I will. <br />244 Mary Jane Chase: Well in the previous on it just went up to 1900, so... <br />245 Tim Klusczinski: Just as a point of clarification, I am not sure that legally that it's <br />246 particularly relevant unless it does somehow manipulate the <br />247 application I not sure that it does in this case, but I will bring it up <br />248 to Catherine and Amy. <br />249 Joann Sporleder: Well, sometime subsequent owners are significant in some way, <br />250 that's my feeling any way. <br />251 Tim Klusczinski: Very Good, any other discussion? Hearing none, Chair entertains a <br />252 motion. <br />253 Lynn Patrick: I motion that we approve certificate of appropriateness number <br />254 2007-1029. <br />255 Tim Klusczinski: Is there a second? <br />256 Mary Jane Chase: Second. <br />257 Tim Klusczinski: The motion has been made and seconded to approve and other <br />258 discussion? Hearing none, All in favor? 6Ayes. Opposed? 0 <br />259 Motion carries unanimously. Thank you very much. <br />260 Mark Bruneau: Thank you very much for your time. . <br />261 Tim Klusczinski: Typically there will be follow up from the staff. Application <br />262 number 2007-1107. <br />263 STAFF REPORT <br />264 CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />