October 2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.00, Lynn Patrick: This is a reconvening of our Octoberl6, 2006. Today's date is October 21, 2006. We again speak to Certificate of Appropriateness 2006-1005A. We will do a roll call: Lynn Patrick, present, Martha Choitz, present, Tim Klusczinski, present, Catherine Hostetler, present, Joann Sporleder, present, Shawn Peterson, present. We also have the homeowner present. Please state your name. Georges Enderle, present We also have from the neighborhood.... Susan Youens. Lynn Patrick: We have just returned from looking at the property; and I have left my little guidebook on Robert's Rules of Order out in the car. I will return to the format that we usually follow which is letting the homeowner make any additional comments which I think by the very nature of this meeting will be very brief. Georges Enderle: Yes, It will. Well, I just want to say that I appreciate that you took so much time to come and to see my house and have a first look at the problems. Lynn Patrick: Thank you. Now do the Commissioners wish to speak who have been looking at it just now? Shawn Peterson: Now I think what would be good would be to go around and do a summary of what said, the discussion. We would move actually to the discussion portion. We have already accomplished the public hearing and the presentation. We're considering the additional evidence; we'll have discussion of additional evidence and we can proceed as far as action. Lynn Patrick: Great. Then I will turn over the discussion portion at least at this juncture to Tim who has spent a lot more time looking at the window, measuring and who was at the house just recently. Tim Klusczinski: I think that it would be important to make the distinction that this particular C of A discusses ten windows and we spent quite a bit of time on four of them in the bay window area. Upon inspection and in your company I wanted to point out that of the illustrations that Professor Enderle submitted, they basically on discuss one window example's dimensions. That is important so that we don't understand that we are looking at a number of different windows. Wayne and I took all of the diagrams and broke them down under the classification to view them in. Professor Enderle submitted five drawings that depict the existing windows under the current conditions, five drawings that modify the existing window openings with storm window that had been drawn in; and finally five drawings that suggest that the replacement openings, or rough openings for that particular window, have the Jeld Wen solution installed. A few problems that I was able to pick out at the site with reference to the example that was submitted and the dimensions that relate to the particular openings that we were looking at. The sill nose here on the existing window print only calls for a width of 7/8 of an inch and we did find at the site that it was approximately two inches which could impose a different perspective to the reveal and the shadow line for this example. So that should be modified, since the diagram for the existing conditions does not make us aware of that. Other consideration should also be given to the fact that a correct profile of the existing C.,