July 2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Todd Zeiger asks the homeowners their intention regarding soffits and eaves. Mr. Butcher answers that he would prefer to encapsulate them with an aluminum product. Mr. Butcher recognizes that some work will have to be done to give a uniform appearance to ensure the trim meets the siding. There were no public comments. Shawn Peterson [Counsel] verifies with the homeowners that the homeowners are aware of and intend to comply with the conditions of the CoA, specifically that they intend to leave the gables and detail exposed. The Butchers reply that some of the decorative elements will have to be replaced as they have, deteriorated beyond the point of repair, but do intend to replace the decorative pieces in kind to preserve the appearance. Mr. Butcher asks the Commission for the recommendation on this matter, and Todd Zeiger replies that the staff recommendations are what they are, and are stated in the CoA. Catherine Hostetler replies that eaves are excluded from specific mention in the current CoA, but offers that the encapsulating of the band boards and soffits can be stipulated. Mrs. Butcher states that she believes that the best course of action regarding those elements will reveal itself during the project. Lynn Patrick notes that the homeowners are looking for some guidance on their project. Todd Zeiger implores the Commission to be sure that their approval is consistent regarding the appearance of the house. Linda Riley asks the homeowner if it is prudent to mix vinyl and aluminum. The homeowner replies yes. Todd Zeiger consults Shawn Peterson [Counsel] regarding the fact that MIM Butcher received a building permit for this work before the creation of the Chapin Park LHD and the guidelines of said. Shawn Peterson [Counsel] responds that in letting the permit expire, the homeowners are now bound by the guidelines that have since been adopted. Gerald Ujdak suggests that the process be expedited, and the CoA be considered only as presented with the understanding that some other details of the project be left for "another_ time" as it is obvious that the homeowners are looking for some guidance in their decision-making. Lynn Patrick, Gerald Ujdak and the: Mr. Butcher discuss their hope that the clear solution to this point presents itself during the project. As the soffit and eaves were not specifically mentioned in the current CoA, Catherine Hostetler verifies that those items can be addressed in a separate CoA. Mr.Butcher asks that if he constructs his scaffolding and begins his work, will he be in violation at any time. Mr. Butcher requests the option of eithet vinyl siding to the soffit and then using an aluminum project on the facia, or merely using the siding on the clapboards and then scraping and painting the overhangs. Martha Choitz asks the homeowner to verify that they won't change the type of siding mid project and thereby change the appearance of the house. The homeowners confirm that they will not change their choice of siding. Tim Klusczinski states that he is unclear on approving a CoA as it appears and wishes to rework it as there aren't any specifications regarding gauge thickness, and would prefer to see a sample of the product to ensure the appearance of the house. Mr. Butcher offers to bring a sample for a review. Tim Klusczinski suggests that Preservation Specialist Wayne Doolittle inspect a sample of the product and compare it to the original clapboards. However, Wayne,Doolittle is out of town. Mr. Butcher responds that if you hold apiece of the Triple -3 siding up next to the house, they appear identical. Shawn Peterson [Counsel] asks the homeowners if they wish to modify their CoA to include the option to eitherpaint or use the aluminum product on specified areas. The homeowners replied yes, as they're not yet sure what is the most prudent course of action. Lynn Patrick moves to approve 2006-0606 817 Leland "with the understanding that they (the homeowners) have the option of vinyling and soffit with aluminum vents and soffit or to scrape and paint the overhang, and that we would like only cover the clapboards and leave the shingles and the gables exposed." "Also the dentil work on the porch will remain in tact or will be replaced in kind". The homeowners confirm that those conditions are clear. Mary Jane Chase seconds the motion as stated. The vote is 7-1, Todd Zeiger voted not to approve.