My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
February 2006
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2006
>
February 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:17 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:12:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001361
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mary Jane Chase: Okay, that's just my suggestion as a possibility. <br />John Peddycord: I simply understand that it would require someone like Alderwoods to spend <br />$268,000. <br />Mary Jane Chase: Okay. That isn't the point I'm discussing. All I'm saying is presenting a view that <br />that would be a possibility. <br />Shawn Peterson: Are there any further questions? <br />Tim Klusczinski: I have a question. I need a point of clarification to either by the staff or the <br />petitioner. Your client purchased the property in 1996 and the landmark status took affect in 2000, <br />and you don't know if your client petitioned for landmark status. <br />John Peddycord: The petition for landmark status was I think by the Commission or staff. <br />Catherine Hostetler: They were sent a letter requesting... <br />John Peddycord: and it wasn't our client. It was a prior owner, possessor of title. <br />Catherine Hostetler: Oak. <br />John Peddycord: Yeah, Oak or Oakwood, or something like that, and I think it was read in record that <br />they... <br />Todd Zeiger: Is Oakwood a subsidiary of Loewen or Alderwoods? <br />John Peddycord: Pardon. <br />Todd Zeiger: Is Oakwood or Oak, the company, a subsidiary of Loewen or Alderwoods? <br />John Peddycord: I don't know if it is a subsidiary or whether they acquired them. That I don't know. <br />Todd Zeiger: That's a question I have for you then, if I could just jump into mine. .I have a question <br />about that. <br />John Peddycord: I don't know. I don't have an answer to that question. <br />Todd Zeiger: Was Oak a subsidiary of Loewen or, it successor, Alderwoods at the time of <br />designation? I believe it was. [Some muffled discussion of the company] Either way their attorney in <br />the minutes... <br />Bernard Diedrich: I think Terry Miller owned the property before, correct? And, I think he sold it to <br />Loewen. <br />Todd Zeiger: I think so, right. Anyway, their attorney did represent that they agreed to the designation <br />and that's in the minutes. So that's related to the point I'm making. <br />Catherine Hostetler: They also, I can clarify that situation, with Mr. Masters speaking on September <br />18, 2000. "The owners take pride in the historic nature of the cemetery. They are only too happy to <br />comply with the Commissioner's request to Landmark the aforementioned structures and sites. They <br />would also like to work with the Commission in eminent repairs to the Riverview Gatehouse." <br />23 January 2006 HPC Meeting Minutes [Corrected Version] <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.