July 2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

"The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights, or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. " The clause "...or ruled inappropriate after Commission review" is not itself appropriate, in that it states no further grounds upon which the installation can be deemed "inappropriate" beyond those already enumerated. This should read "...unless approved by the HPC." As stated, it seems to say that even if nothing about the installation is specifically prohibited, the HPC can still arbitrarily decide it is "inappropriate" for unstated reasons or for no reason. This is so vague as to be unenforceable. Page 18: "Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored When maintaining or replacing original siding is not feasible, aluminum or vinyl siding may be used When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. " The phrases "is not feasible" and "Every effort" are both extremely vague. Page 20: Note: Language about saving removed items for future owners was intentionally inserted by the Standards Committee, as this was explicitly explained by the HPC Inspector as what was meant by the term "retained". Although we question the accuracy of his interpretation, we felt that if this were indeed the intent of the language, then it should be spelled out. This language was removed by the HPC, and therefore the entire section should be revised to account for the inconsistency in which the word "retained" is being used and/or interpreted. Page 23: "Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. " The phrase "only feasible alternative" is impossibly vague, and it does not specify in whose opinion the question of feasibility lies. This phrase should never be used in such a document. Page 25: "E. There shall be a liaison committee consisting of five (S) property owners in the district. The committee's responsibility will be to work with the residents of the district and the Historic Preservation Commission (See Appendix D). " Appendix D still refers to "A group of three people ...." Appendix B: The meaning of this appendix in the context of regulation is unclear. Who makes and /or approves such a list of allowable species, who requires such a permit, and how does the neighborhood go about creating and enforcing such requirements. It is presumed that since such a list is not included in the body of the restrictions, one is not at present in force.