July 2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

essentially expresses their position. If you do not have a copy of this I brought extra copies with me so that you can have that in your file. (passed out printed copies of the letter for commission members to keep). I am not sure if you are familiar with this particular property. You take Hickory Road north into Knollwood. As Hickory Road dead ends into Adams Road this bam structure is located immediately to the north of Adams Road. When the Sieradzkis originally purchased this particular piece of property they did so as an investment. They wanted to divide the land. Jim Sieradzki is a very well known builder in the area known as Century Builders. He has the land plotted with six sites that he would like to put homes on. I also brought with me a copy of the site plan that was submitted to the county plan commission. Presently he has the road going into this particular area off to the left hand side of the bam. Nothing's been done to the barn to change it from the state that he received it in when he purchased the property. He does though believe that designating this bam as a landmark will substantially impair the value of the property and is going to limit its marketability because anyone that wishes to purchase the property is going to have to purchase it subject to the restrictions that come with the landmark designation. He believes that he will be applying to a smaller market pool of purchasers than if the designation was not assigned. Based upon his experience he believes there will be a considerable expense in rehabilitating the barn to its original condition. There are a few noticeable features associated with the barn right now that leave it in a state that is what I would consider to be unoriginal. The hinged doors on the front doors of the bam have been removed by the prior landowner and now you have the sliding doors that you typically see on a pole bam. The west side of the bam has a different wall than the rest of the bam does and must have been altered at some point in time in the past. In order to restore this bam to an 1880's condition, considerable expense will need to be made. It is also the Sieradzki's position that there are much better examples of bams within the immediate area. They also contend that there are other bams that are more appropriate displays of architecture for this time period; however, I can't cite to you were those barns are located. As I mentioned the file came into me late this afternoon and the Sieradzki had a proceeding that they needed to be at this evening. I think I have effectively surmised their position and I don't know if I have enough information in my file to answer your questions; but, I will field them and report them to the Scieranskies as your concerns here this evening. JOHN OXIAN: I am Chairman of the Landmarks Committee. We did go out and look at the bam. When you make a landmark you do not ask the owner to come in and make any changes to whatever comes in at the time it's a landmark. So if the landmark comes in and the bam is in that condition it stays in that condition until the owner wants to make changes. The bam is rated and besides that truthfully in our opinion the whole property is rated; because, there is history that shows wood was taken off that property to build bridges in Mishawaka. In my opinion, even though the house is covered with aluminum siding; I would still include it because the house and the barn are too close together to separate one from the other. You also have a milk house there which is also significant as well as other items on the property. An individual lived there that was important enough in the history of St. Joe County to have contributed to it. We have made a lot of farms in the county as landmarks. If we were just going to go by one barn instead of another person's bam then you wouldn't have almost seventy landmarks in the county. Being that you're new at this I figured you should learn something from it too. The