Laserfiche WebLink
2 KAREN HAMMOND-NASH: In October, I gave the commission a report on my attendance of <br />3 the Public Library's open house displaying the capacities of their new digital/computer <br />4 duplication equipment. Julie attended a more technical meeting on November 22nd <br />5 <br />6 JULIE SCHUTTE then gave commission members a report on the November 22nd, specifically <br />7 about the lack of preservation planned for the library's clipping files. The clipping files are <br />8 being digitized, but there is no system to catalogue and preserve the hard copies. The clipping <br />9 files will remain at the Main Branch for three years, but after those years, they may be pitched. <br />10 The library staff is also only digitizing the images from the 1875 & 1911 Atlas' and not full <br />11 pages and text. <br />12 <br />13 JOHN OXIAN: I would like to make a motion that a letter be sent to the library stating that the <br />14 newspaper clippings file be kept indefinitely, so that those individuals that do not know how to <br />15 operate a computer will still be able to have access to the files. <br />16 <br />17 GERALD UJDAK: Seconds the motion <br />18 <br />19 LYNN PATRICK: recommended amending the motion so that instead of saying keep the <br />20 original documents "indefinitely," keep them "in nemetuity" for people who can't use <br />21 computers; for the sake of historical accuracy, for a resource, for context, for continuity, because <br />22 I think that more people would agree with those reasons, even if some could say, "well, these <br />23 people can just learn how to use a computer." <br />24 Gerald Ujdak also made a suggestion that this letter be sent to each board member, and <br />25 that the motion be made in to a resolution so that all members of the commission could sign it. <br />26 <br />27 Both amendments were agreed to, and the motion passed unanimously. <br />28 <br />29 2. Leeper Park Island tree trimming and removal; correspondence with <br />30 City Park Department; joint meeting with Construction Company. <br />31 <br />32 KAREN HAMMOND-NASH: I believe most commission members are informed regarding the <br />33 background of this. The commission will probably remember that in November we issued yet <br />34 another modification to the original certificate of appropriateness issued in 1999, regarding the <br />35 restoration and rebuilding of Leeper Park Island wall. The original specifications were that no <br />36 mature trees would be damaged. We have received an application from the city forester, who had <br />37 a conversation with the Engineering Department, and determined that it was necessary to take <br />38 down two large trees, of spruce species, and to limb other trees up to approximately five feet, and <br />39 to clear various scrub. The commission approved that application. <br />40 Shortly before Christmas the office received numerous communications that more than <br />41 trees were coming down. Our staff attorney, hopefully, communicated our concerns to the <br />42 Engineering Department with a view towards resolving and mitigating damage. The city forester <br />43 was on vacation at the time; however, the first day back from his vacation he did go down to the <br />44 island and make some notes and communicate with people regarding the mediation of damage <br />45 and for the preservation of the trees that were there. <br />46 We had a meeting on January 201h, which was approximately one month after the initial <br />47 damage had occurred at Leeper Park Island. The architectural historian was present; Catherine <br />4 <br />