Laserfiche WebLink
WYTHOUGAN VALLEY PRESERVATION COUNCIL, INC. <br />308 South Michigan St. - Plymouth, IN 46563 (574) 936-7517 <br />`preserving the standing reminders of our collective Marshall County past" <br />December 23, 2003 <br />Mr. Chris Baynes <br />100 N. Senate Avenue Rm N8 5 5 <br />Indianapolis, IN 46204 <br />RE: US 31 - Plymouth to South Bend Study, Marshall County historic properties <br />Dear Mr. Baynes: <br />I am writing this letter ons behalf of Wythougan Valley Preservation Council, Marshall County's <br />local ureservation organization and Linda Rippy, Marshall County Historian. I have been in ' <br />review of the U.S. 31 Plymouth to South Bend Study material forwarded to Linda Rippy and <br />have been at times a consulting party to INDOT on other projects. I understand Mrs. Rippy has <br />forwarded some concerns regarding historic properties potentially affected by the proposed <br />routes; we have recently surveyed the areas of potential effe6ts and would Eke to offer some <br />comments. <br />I must first offer this preface to all comments concerning historic properties. The idea of a "new" <br />new U.S. 31 itself does not seem absolutely necessary. Had new 31 been constructed correctly <br />we would not be in this current situation today. Although I find it amusing to justify a newly <br />constructed road destroying property, farm & wetlands to enable individuals from South Bend to <br />arrive in Indianapolis 20 minutes sooner (over the entire length none -the -less), I will concede that <br />safety must be considered.I only hope that the speed Emit is enforced on the new road unlike the <br />current road, which if it then is, I predict people in South Bend would get to Indianapolis 20 <br />minutes LATER than they do currently. Yet again, I concede to individuals who must be far <br />more intelligent than I (or powerful) to determine that we do indeed need this road. <br />Again, Mrs. Rippy, and I surveyed the area of potential effects. We most favor combined <br />Alternate Route C, E, & F as it passes through Marshall County, following the old Vandalia <br />Railroad Line. Alternate G and combined Alternates C, E, G, G -C would have detrimental <br />affects on historic properties whereas the alternate route which follows the old Vandalia Line <br />would have minimal affect to historic properties. Please consider the following: <br />1) The two alternate routes we object to above will pass too near the White Family <br />Cemetery on East 2C Road, North Township, Marshall County (one to the immediate east <br />and one to the immediate west). Part of the character (and protection from vandalism) of <br />this small cemetery is its secluded location on a wooded hilltop. The dozen or so graves <br />are intermingled with mature trees and surrounded by a loose laid stone fence. The entire <br />hilltop is wooded and should remain so. Our fear is that although the new highway would <br />