Laserfiche WebLink
Staff cannot recommend approval of the demolition of the brickwork, flat -arches, stone keystones, <br />and stone lintels surrounding the: <br />1.) Existing north and west Dining Room windows, <br />2.) North Kitchen window, <br />3.) North window adjacent to the back door, <br />4.) And the back door. <br />The windows with their decorative elements are key features of the home's historic character. See <br />above paragraphs for more information. Staff generally recommends the reused of original materials <br />and elements in the proposed plan. However, this will not be possible under the current proposal due to <br />the wood frame construction of the addition and the use of different window types rather than <br />replacement windows. <br />Staff cannot not recommend the approval of the construction the following proposed additions. <br />1.) Screened porch with shed roof, <br />2.) Entry portico and addition with shed roof, <br />3.) French doors, <br />4.) And the bay window with shed roof, <br />Staff has no opinion regarding the asphalt roof. It does not appear to be original to the residence. <br />Staff would be more willing to send a favorable recommendation of a proposal that retained and <br />exposed more of the brick exterior and more of the brick detailing (arch, lintel, and keystone) on the rear <br />of the Jones' residence. Staff would be willing to recommend approval of a proposal that included some <br />window changes (French doors, bays) if changes to the rear profile of the house were not so dramatic <br />and if the brick detailing were retained. Staff applauds the use of the pilasters as a design element and <br />suggests the design of a less intrusive "out -door room" that employs the pilasters. <br />