My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 2002
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2002
>
May 2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:23 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:10:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001402
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT <br />CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A <br />CERTIFIATE OF APPROPRIATENESS <br />Application . Number: 2002-0417 <br />Property Location: 1012 Riverside Drive, South Bend <br />Property Owner: Gabrielle Robinson & Mike Keen <br />Landmark or District Designation: Local Historic District — Riverside Drive <br />National Registry Historic District — Chapin Park <br />Rating: Significant -11 <br />STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT <br />In 1919 attorney Frank Gilmer purchased lot 10 of Wetzstein's Riverside Heights <br />Addition, and in 1920 built this Romantic Period revival -style home. It is one of six houses <br />between the Riverside Drive White Oak stand, and Shetterly Park. It overlooks the river to the <br />Northeast, and faces Shetterly Park. <br />Former residents include Helen and Leslie Morehouse, from 1927 to 1937 (Mr. <br />Morehouse was the editor of the South Bend Tribune); Mr. and Mrs. Duncan O'Coner, from <br />1937 to 1957 (during which period Mr. O'Coner was superintendent at South Bend lathe); Mr. <br />and Mrs. Lester E. Menzie, from 1957 to 1973; Kenneth Grant from 1973 to 1999; Allen and <br />Arleen (?) Howard, from 1999, presumably until sale to the present owners. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />A The proposed 8 -foot long, 6 -foot high privacy fence is as un -obnoxious as a privacy <br />fence can be, and it does not extend beyond the building setback. However, it is still not <br />historically appropriate, and, more importantly, it would impact upon the neighbors' ability <br />to walk around their garage, and possibly to maintain their garage. Staff cannot <br />recommend approval of the fence. <br />B The steps between the upper and lower terraces, as described in the Application, are <br />well planned, historically appropriate, and will enhance the property. Staff <br />recommends approval. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.