May 2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

applicant would retain the existing 3' tall fencing and would place the 6' tall fencing several feet inside of it. The new fence would effectively enclose the back yards of both lots into one large enclosed back yard. If a house sat on this side lot, the effect the fences would have is as follows. The new fencing would enclose only the back yards and the front yards would be enclosed by the existing picket fence. Since there is no house, there the owner is proposing to landscape the front yard to help buffer the impact of the 6' fence. The owners are requesting to enclose the rear yard because they have two large dogs and because of the amount of trespassing that occurs over the 3' tall cement block fence that adjoins the alley. The request to fence in a rear yard and side yard with a 6' tall privacy fence is with in the guidelines and is something the Commission has approved in the past. When fencing is visible because of large side yards the Commission often requests that it be buffered by trees or shrubs. The owner is requesting the same thing; the only difference is that the side yard is an entire second lot. The new fence would not protrude past the rear line of the house and would be buffered by vegetation. The staff finds the application to be with in the guidelines and recommends approval. This property is also located with in the W. Washington Design Review area and as such will require consideration by Design Review. The guidelines for this area state that major landscaping items, fencing. must be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color and that no type of fencing is allowed in the front or side yard and only fencing that is absolutely needed based on security/privacy will be approved in the rear yard. This house already has fencing in the rear, side and front, none of which will be affected except the small portion located by the driveway. The owner definitely has privacy & security issues by being located on such a busy intersection with full view of their property from both sides as well as the added security issues of being adjacent to an alley. The Commission does not abide by these guidelines, however, the Commission should be aware of how Design Review may perceive this project. The staff STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT ALL COMMISSION MEMBERS GO OUT AND VIEW THIS PROPERTY PRIOR TO OUR MEETING IN ORDER TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION ON THIS MATTER. 2