April 2001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

The building still meets three of the criteria: 1) Its embodiment of elements or architectural design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represents an architectural characteristic or innovation; 2) Its suitability for preservation; 3) Its identification with the life of a person or persons of historical significance. The site and structure fulfills criteria #Ias a wonderful example of a late 1800s Italianate style residence. Its main features are its brick walls, gable decoration and the wonderful bowed windows and window hoods, all are classic Italianate features. The site and structures fulfills criteria #2 as an example of an 1880's workmanship in the popular Italianate style with little change to its original fabric. The site and structures fulfills criteria #3 by its association with the very prominent Metzgar family. The petitioner is requesting to remove the landmark status from the entire 41.66 acres, currently referred to as the Risler Farm. At February's meeting, the petitioners expressed an interest in compromising by retaining the landmark designation for the house while rescinding the designation for the rest of the property. However, the staff has not received anything in writing to this effect from either Mrs. Risler or her representative, Mr. Hardig. The staff would concur that a compromise is in order regarding this property. With the surrounding development and lack of connection between the house and the farm land there is a strong case for approving the removal of the farm acreage from the landmark designation. The staff feels that under no circumstances should the landmark designation be removed from the house and that simply retaining the designation for the house and driveway is not enough. The staff recommends that landmark designation for the house and surrounding two acres should be retained while the remaining 39.66 acres be removed from landmark designation. Retaining the house with two acres will protect the surrounding wooded area as well as protect the house from road widening, future access roads to the new subdivision and the intrusion of new homes to the visual impact of the house. The staff feels this is a more then fare compromise. Should the owner wish to retain more the two acres with the house for future sale they will need to notify the Commission immediately. If the petitioner agrees with the staff recommendation they will then need to have both parcels of land surveyed and issue the complete legal descriptions to the Commission before the Commission can start the proceedings for rescinding of the landmark designation on the agreed upon parcel of land. 5