My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 2000
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2000
>
May 2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:22 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:10:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001402
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATION <br />The applicant is proposing once again to install a channel "shadow image" opaque <br />lettered sign on the east elevation, top floor. The sign will be exactly the same as those <br />proposed in an earlier application. It will contain 7" deep, back -lit, fabricated channel <br />letters, spelling Old Kent. The sign will be illuminated by 12mm Ruby Red neon tubing <br />powered by a France Transformer to be housed behind the wall. The letters will be <br />mounted to the wall with 2" standoffs. The entire sign would be 324.00" wide and <br />38.70" tall. <br />The Commission originally tabled this issue for a month to allow the applicant <br />time to design a more suitable sign or a better way of attaching the proposed sign. When <br />this application came before the Commission a month later the applicant no longer <br />wished to pursue a sign on the upper East elevation. The Commission denied the <br />application. The staff received a new application from Old Kent again requesting the <br />exact same sign they previously withdrew for the east elevation. Although the <br />application is new the applicant has made no effort to alter the sign in any way nor have <br />they found a better method of mounting the sign to the building. <br />The Staff is recommending denial of application 2000-0414 for the following reasons: <br />1. It clearly violates the guidelines which specifically states that neon signs and <br />super graphics are not allowed. <br />2. A landmark is not allowed to have more then one sign, unless original to the <br />structure. <br />3. The proposed sign would be located on a highly decorated fagade of the <br />structure and would block as well as possibly damage significant detail. <br />4. Installing a sign of this size would necessitate the boring of 28 holes, each <br />3/8" wide, in the side of the building. damaging and weakening the Indiana <br />Limestone. <br />5. A sign at this location would detract from the buildings unique and <br />outstanding gothic architecture. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.