April 2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I COMMISSION MEETING 2 MINUTES 3 FOR MARCH 4 5 Committee Meeting County -City Building 6 7:30 p.m. 7 Floor Conference Room 7 Monday, March 20, 2000 8 9 10 I. Call to Order 11 John Oxian, president of the Commission, brought the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. 12 13 II. Roll Call 14 Commission members present were: Catherine Hostetler, Gerald Ujdak, John Oxian, 15 Joann Sporleder, Jerry Weiner and Martha Choitz. 16 Commission staff present were: Ed Talley, Director, Rhonda Saunders, Assistant Director 17 and Cheryl Greene, Council. 18 Also attending the meeting were: Mark Schlutt, Jim Markle, Tamara Sexton, Jerry 19 Sexton, Bruce Calvert, Scott Rozanski, Ken Herceg, Steve Ullery, Chris Taelman, 20 Michael Kollowski, Don Wood, Greg Kil, Bryan Jesswein and Don Sporleder. 21 22 23 III. Public Hearing 24 A. Certificate of Appropriateness Applications 25 1.2000 — 0210 -2, 515 Riverside Drive, landscaping. 26 Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs. He also noted that the 27 landscape architect, Mark Schlutt, was present. Mr. Oxian asked of the photo examples, 28 which terrace would the proposed terrace resemble. Mr. Schlutt stated that the proposed 29 terrace would best resemble the wood terrace. Mrs. Hostetler moved to approve the 30 application as recommended by staff. Mrs. Sporleder seconded the motion. The motion 31 passed unanimously. 32 33 2.2000 -0229, 112 S. Lafayette, lighting. 34 Mr. Talley presented the staff report and circulated photographs and product information. 35 He also noted that architects, Ken Herceg and Scott Rozanski, were present on behalf of 36 the County Commissioners. Mr. Talley stated that the application submitted is in three 37 parts, addendum number one pertaining to the roof lighting, addendum number two refers 38 to the courtyard lighting and addendum number three pertains to wall mounted lighting. 39 Mr. Talley gave a brief history of the difficulties involved in the lighting of this structure 40 and the violations that have occurred. He further noted that originally the project was to 41 use replicas of lights that were popular in downtown South Bend, however, those lights 42 have since been dropped for a fixture that has never been used in South Bend. Mr. Talley 43 also reported that the staff was not in favor of the size of the current roof top fixtures nor 44 were they in favor of the proposed pole lights and wattage. Mr. Herceg reported that 45 there has been a lot of confusion regarding the light fixtures on and around this structure. 46 He proceeded to give various reasons as to why the cupola lighting was the size it was