Laserfiche WebLink
JOSEPH J. MONTEL <br />DONALD J. STUCKEY <br />GRANT VANHORNE <br />CLARAMARY VANHORNE WINEBRENNER <br />VANHORNE & STUCKEY <br />_1i-rorzvr:ys A -r <br />112 SOUTH CEDAR STREET <br />POST OFFICE BOX 523 <br />AU111112N. IN-T)1A. a 40700 <br />TEL: 219/925-1966 <br />FAX. 219/925-6166 <br />December 29, 1997 <br />Mr. David B. Duvall <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />of South Bend and St. Joseph County <br />227 West Jefferson, Room 1123 <br />County -City Building <br />South Bend, Indiana 46601 - <br />RE: Robert Montel and Sherry Mantel <br />60500 Bremen Highway (S.R. 331) <br />Dear David: <br />WINSLOW VANHORNE <br />1 1908.19891 <br />JEFFREY L. TURNER <br />OF COUNSEL <br />Thank you for taking the time to speak with me on Tuesday (December 16, 1997). As we discussed, <br />the St. Joseph County/South Bend Building Department, through attorney Kenneth P. Fedder, has <br />confirmed that the Building Department will not be able to issue any permits to the above referenced real <br />estate until such time as the Historic Preservation Commission withdraws its pending objection. The HFC <br />objection stems from an ordinance ostensibly passed in 1976 (Ordinance #107-76) purporting to designate a <br />forty (40) acre tract on "Bremen Road" as a Historic Landmark. <br />Numerous factors exist warranting removal of the HPC objection, .which will be discussed toward <br />the end of this correspondence. The HPC's position that the above referenced real estate is a Historic <br />Landmark should also be addressed in conjunction with the resolution of its pending objection. These issues <br />are further compounded by two factors which have been discussed at length with your office and its <br />attorney (Ms. DeRose). First, the real estate is being exposed to potential structural damage as a result of the <br />stop order issued by the Building Department as there is no protective exterior (siding) upon a portion of the <br />residence; and, second, no certificate of appropriateness can be filed since such a request would presuppose <br />the real estate is in fact a Historic Landmark. The entire problem is compounded by the absence of any <br />established procedure within the HFC for de -certification (or dis-establishment or un -designation, <br />whichever of these terms is most appropriate under the circumstances) of real estate believed, correctly or <br />erroneously, to be a Historic Landmark. <br />