Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />windows. Mrs. Choitz moved to approve the C of A as submitted. Mrs. Sporleder <br />• seconded. Mrs. Choitz called the question. The motion to approve the install-, <br />ation of a new driveway, the construction of a free standing garage and the con- <br />version of the existing garage into a family room passed unanimously. <br />3; 1425 ;Eaat >Wayne = East Wayne-LHD <br />Mr. Frederick read the staff report including the report made by Ms. Katrina <br />Laflin, HPC landscape consultant. Mr. Oxian asked the applicant if there were <br />any questions concerning the reports. Mrs. Hasse responded in the negative. She <br />stated that the immediate concern were the foundation plantings and the paver brick <br />walkway. Mrs. Hostetler stated that there were Municipal Codes that governed the <br />use of the tree lawn. Discussion ensued concerning the goals of the proposed <br />plan. Mrs. Sporleder asked about the condition of the existing shrubbery. Mrs. <br />Hasse repied that the shrubbery was quite old and somewhat out of control. <br />Mrs. Sporleder moved to approve the foundation plantings and the walkway'-1rom <br />house to street as Mr. Oxian had suggested subject to approval from relevant <br />city agencies. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Oxian asked about the Indiana <br />Historic Sites and Structures Inventory house ranking system as applied to the two <br />applicant's houses on East Wayne. Discussion ensued concerning the rating system. <br />4. 630 West Washington - LL <br />Mr. Frederick read the staff report. Mr. Oxian asked if the HPC would grant <br />partial approval, members of the commission replied that the proposal should <br />be considered as a whole. Mrs. Hostetler asked if Landmark Standards mandated <br />the replacement of slate with slate. She then asked about financial considerations <br />and alternative materials. Mr. Oxian asked that the C of A be assigned to <br />committee. Mrs. Sporleder urged caution in any potential treatment because of the <br />• implications for listing on the National Register. Mrs. Choitz suggested finding <br />alternatives to the applicant's proposal and slate as well. Mr. Eide stated that <br />the applicant's proposed replacement medium was innappropriate. Mrs. Hostetler <br />moved that the C of A application be placed with the Maintenance Committee where <br />Committee members would meet with the applicant to discuss alternative solutions. <br />Mrs. Petrass seconded the motion. Mr. Oxian asked if the Committee would have the <br />final say. The motion passed unanimously with the recommendation that the Committee <br />finding be subject to HPC approval. Mrs. Sporleder asked about possible tax benefits <br />and NRHP listing. Mr. Frederick replied that those options had been explored with <br />a resulting negative response from the owner/applicant. <br />IV. Regular Business <br />A. Approval of Minutes -August 16, 1993 <br />Mr. Oxian discussed the minutes with Mr. Frederick prior to the meeting. <br />Mrs. Choitz moved to accept the minutes as submitted. Mrs. Hostetler <br />seconded. The motion passed without dissent. <br />B. Treasurer's Report <br />Mr. Frederick announced he had submitted the printing bill for the summary <br />report. Mr. Eide asked about a potential windfall regarding the Director's salary. <br />Mr. Oxian responded detailing the IRS ruling, the county position and the position <br />of the HPC regarding those funds. <br />C. Correspondence <br />No report <br />• D. Committee Reports <br />Mr. Frederick provided the details of the staff approved C of A 's <br />