November 1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. DeRose responded that he and his insurance carrier were liable; she suggested that the case was possibly not worth the effort, and possible litigation, required to seek compliance. Mr. Herendeen stated that the owner volunteered to construct the rail and it was included in the COA; the HPC must consider whether their credibility was at stake. Mr. Welsheimer suggested that this was an area in which the HPC had no jurisdiction. Mrs. Choitz stated that she too was concerned about liability when the COA was first considered; she wanted to be "on record" that the HPG had considered safety when the plan was first approved. Mr. Eide moved that staff contact the owner to suggest that the owner comply with the original COA as submitted to avoid Possible liability and to contact the complainant to explain the HPC's Position in the matter. Mr. Welsheimer seconded the motion. No further discussion. The motion Passed by a vote of six to one. Mr. Oxian voted nay. Mr. Herendeen abstained. 4. Historic Districts No report. Mr. Oxian announced that the River Bend Historic District proposal was scheduled to be considered by the Common Council on the following Monday. 5. Historic Landmarks 1. 1606 West Ewing -- First Reading The owners of this property submitted a proposal for landmark designation to the HPC; staffwillsubmit a report in November. 2. James Madison School, 804 N. Lafayette -- First Reading This proposal was initiated by Mr. Oxian; staff will submit a report in November. 6. Standards and Maintenance a. Maintenance Update Mr. Holycross submitted a report updating various maintenance issues: A. Central/ Madison Schools'-- The South Bend School Corporation was sent a letter on 7-28-92 asking for compliance with HPC maintenance policy after site visits by staff and Mr. Herendeen revealed numerous problems with both structures. Acting Superintendent Ralph Komasinski replied on 7