Laserfiche WebLink
v <br />she wanted to know what new responsibilities the <br />district would create for landlords. <br />Mr. Chuck Watson of 511 Riverside Drive said he was <br />also confused. He said he had received a letter from <br />an attorney warning him that a district would mean <br />severe restrictions on all exterior home repair, <br />including painting. He wanted to know the true scope <br />of these restrictions; he also wanted to know the <br />probable impact on property values. <br />Ms. Linda Fritschner of 621 E. Riverside Drive spoke <br />of the neighborhood's importance to the vitality of <br />downtown South Bend. <br />Mr. Bruce Wood of 225 E. Navarre said he had spent the <br />last 20 years working to preserve inner-city <br />neighborhoods. He said that, recently, 6-8 homes in <br />the area east of Michigan Street had been destroyed. <br />Apx. 18 months before, the zoning had been changed to <br />"commercial" in the block immediately east of Michigan <br />Street. Commercial encroachment was therefore a real <br />and long-established threat. Establishing the River <br />Bend district would be a significant effort to <br />preserve South Bend's inner city neighborhoods. <br />Ms. Sandi Schohl of 527 Riverside Drive said that <br />River Bend was a good neighborhood; it was <br />conveniently close to downtown and was a good place to <br />raise children. However, erosion was becoming <br />increasingly evident; and the more the area ran down, <br />the greater the danger of acquisition by Memorial <br />Hospital. <br />Mr. Tony,Zappia, an attorney hired by neighborhood <br />resident Gene Forsyth, then presented a case against <br />the proposal. Mr. Forsyth, he said, owned 15 <br />properties in the River Bend neighborhood. He claimed <br />that, should a vote be taken allowing one vote for <br />each property in the area (instead of one vote for <br />each owner) the majority would oppose the district. <br />He then said that the area did not qualify <br />historically/culturally. <br />He said most of the residents did not know what level <br />of standards would be applied to the district. He <br />believed that the more stringent "rehabilitative" <br />standards would be applied. Most of those supporting <br />the district, he claimed, did not know the <br />significance of the "rehabilitative" designation. It <br />was his understanding that rehabilitation standards <br />were very strict. <br />He then read excerpts from the comprehensive <br />