Laserfiche WebLink
agreed with the city or approached the city asking for <br />condemnation, then the owner could be directed to <br />follow the procedure, but technically the HPC did not <br />have much control over a state agency. <br />.lean Denne se conded the motion; ac unanimously._._ <br />VII. Hearing of Visitors <br />A. Studebaker Golf Course -- Potential Acquisition by School <br />Board <br />Tom Haas, representing the South Bend District Golf <br />Association, said he had come to the meeting to <br />petition for landmark status for the Studebaker Golf <br />Course. The golf course, he said, was built in 1921 on <br />24.1 acres purchased in 1919 from the Studebakers. <br />Recently, the South Bend School Board had asked the <br />Park Board for the land. The Park Board was now <br />considering the offer. His understanding was that the <br />Park Board could not give up the land unless it was <br />deemed "unneeded and unused." <br />He contended that the golf course possessed historic <br />value because it dated from 1919, and because the land <br />was purchased from the Studebakers. He wished now to <br />learn the procedures for designating a landmark. <br />Mrs. Sporleder asked him to name his real objective in <br />landmarking the golf course. He said he wanted to keep <br />the golf course in its present location - -to save it. <br />The School Board wanted, he said, to expand the Riley <br />High School classroom building, and to make room for a <br />football field and tennis court. He then pointed out <br />that South Bend was the only second -class city in <br />Indiana with a city -owned 9 -hale golf course. Also, <br />the golf course predated Riley High School by several <br />years. In 1929, the Park Board had denied a request to <br />sell off parts of the golf course to accommodate Riley. <br />Mr. Herendeen asked Mr. Haas whether the use of the <br />golf course was significant. Mr. Haas replied that, in <br />1991, a record number of rounds had been played on the <br />course - -more than 23,000. Mr. Herendeen said that, in <br />this case, there was no way the Park Board could <br />honestly claim that the land was unneeded and unused. <br />Mr. Haas replied that, to his knowledge, the Park <br />Board's position was to sell the land if the offer was <br />good enough. He said that, within the next few years, <br />the School Board would commit to renovating Adams, <br />Riley and Madison schools. If the Park Board ceded the <br />13 <br />