October 1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

long for use. It was suggested that Historic Preservation Commission be used, along with the phone number. Mr. Herendeen recommended that the Commission go with silk screening, perhaps with the city and/or county seal. Mr. Oxian suggested that the staff check with the city sign department to see if they have a silk screen of the seal already on file. V. Old Business VI. New Business a) Photo Processing Mr. Pastor presented options on how the Commission might handle its photo processing in the future. He suggested that the Commission send the film to Dill's Camera Shop for the processing of the film to negatives, then contracting with Leigh Booker (separately contracted from her current contract as surveyor) to prepare the negatives and develop the contact prints. Mr. Herendeen asked about the archival stability of the photo processing. Mr. Pastor stated that it would be similar to those which have been processed in the past, but that none of these is up to the State standards, which recommend the use of fiber paper for developing archivally stable prints. Mr. Pastor stated that it would be more expensive to have the prints made on fiber paper due to the method of processing (roll drum). Mr. Newburn suggested that the records be placed on microfilm. Mr. Pastor stated that he could check with camera stores and other professionals to discern what difference exists between the archival stability of resin coated paper and that of fiber paper. If there is little difference, the savings of the proposed plan 3 (to have'dills develop the film and have Leigh Booker develop the prints from the negatives) would be significant. VII. Hearing of Visitors No Report VIII. Announcements No Report IX. Adjournment and Miscellaneous Matters The meeting adjourned at 8:46 p.m.