Laserfiche WebLink
B. Treasurer's Report - August 1990 <br />Mrs. Petrass moved to file the treasurer's report <br />for audit; Mrs. Dennen seconded; motion approved. <br />C. Correspondence <br />Mrs. Dixon submitted the correspondence for <br />review by the Commission. <br />D. Committee Reports <br />1. Certificates of Appropriateness <br />a. Mrs. Dixon submitted a draft of a new <br />Certificate of Appropriateness policy <br />to the Commission for their review. <br />The policy would be of greater detail <br />than existing policy. Mr. Oxian stated <br />that the adoption of this procedure <br />would be as an amendment to the <br />original procedure as stated in the <br />preservation plan book. He further <br />stated that we would want to look at <br />court cases which have been won or lost <br />because of a commission's adherence to <br />set policies and procedures. He stated <br />that he felt that this procedure was <br />better because it was more detailed <br />than the existing policy. <br />Mr. Eide stated that he would put his <br />comments in writing. Mrs. Dixon stated <br />that the Commission should review the <br />proposal and provide the staff with any <br />comments they wish to make before the <br />next meeting. <br />Ms. DeRose requested a copy of the <br />draft. Mrs. Dixon stated that she <br />would provide her with such. <br />Mrs. Petrass asked if the Commission <br />had a time frame on the current policy. <br />Mrs. Dixon stated that the Commission <br />is required to act within thirty days <br />from the application for a C. of A. <br />but the applicant did not have a <br />deadline for submitting an application <br />in order to be included on the agenda <br />of the next meeting. <br />Mr. Eide asked if the proposed policy <br />corresponded with the building permit <br />requirements in any way. Mrs. Dixon <br />stated that she believed the policy was <br />similar, but would check to be certain. <br />