My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 1990
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1990
>
1990 Minutes Book 2
>
October 1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2019 1:43:03 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001420
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b). Magnetic Signs <br />Mr. Pastor reported that he had discussed the <br />matter of including one or both logos of the city <br />and county governments on the signs with the sign <br />manufacturers in the area. Several of those <br />companies previously contacted stated that they <br />did not have the capability to include the logos <br />on the signs. The previous low bidder, with a <br />bid of $50 for four signs, does not have the <br />capacity to include logos on the signs. A new <br />bidder has offered the price of $150 for four <br />signs with logos. $50 of that would be a <br />one—time fee for developing the logo. Additional <br />orders would not include this fee because the <br />pattern would be already on file. <br />Mr. Pastor explained the need for magnetic signs <br />to those Commission members who had been absent <br />at the previous meeting. The Commission members <br />proceded to discuss the potential harm to the <br />automobiles and determined that care must be <br />taken to remove the signs from the cars daily. <br />Mr. Herendeen and Mr. Oxian stated that they felt <br />the logos were important and necessary. <br />Mr. Eide moved that the Commission authorize the <br />purchase of magnetic signs with a logo; Mrs. <br />Petrass seconded. Mrs. Sporleder stated that she <br />did not feel that the logo(s) were necessary, but <br />rather that the important information was the <br />name and the telephone number. <br />Six Commission members voted in favor of the <br />motion: one opposed. Motion approved. <br />Mrs. Choitz reported on the Scenic Vista program <br />in England. The property owners turn their <br />scenic vistas over to the government for <br />protection, similar to a facade easement. Such a <br />program has been instigated in the U.S. for <br />vistas around historic sites, such as <br />battlefields and historic homes, but it has not <br />taken hold with the general public. <br />She further reported that persons at the National. <br />Trust in Britain stated that this vista program <br />is the only thing keeping them from lnOk7nU the <br />way the United States does, in terms of <br />development. etc. The new developments are <br />tucked away, rather than lining the hio-hw;;%-s as <br />they do in the U.S. <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.