My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
October 1986
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1986
>
October 1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2019 12:40:58 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:07:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001490
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
01 <br />• <br />The <br />APPENDIX A <br />What's Hiding Under the Siding Issue <br />in Florissant, Missouri? <br />A two year struggle between the historic district com- <br />mission in Old Town Florissant and a property owner <br />remains unresolved. The Old Town Commission has de- <br />sign review jurisdiction over 60 blocks of an historic <br />district protecting the character of the French colonial <br />town which was settled by trappers and guides exploring <br />the West. The district and ordinance were established in <br />1973 and is one of the most well established historic areas <br />in Missouri. <br />The property owner began making changes last Fall to <br />his French colonial house without a building permit or <br />certificate from the commission. The changes planned for <br />the building included vinyl siding, turned posts, a scal- <br />loped fascia board, spindled railing, concrete steps and a <br />stained glass door with the intent of converting the house <br />into the Queen Anne style. The proposed changes do not <br />meet the established guidelines which were designed to <br />maintain the integrity of structures within the district. <br />Since the City originally summoned the property own- <br />er to appear before Municipal Court for not receiving the <br />necessary permits, the issue has been the focus of a series <br />of hearings by the Planning and Zoning Commission and <br />the City Council and a countersuit against the city by the <br />property owner. The latest development is a request by <br />the property owner to demolish the building. The owner <br />has been requested to withdraw this latest application <br />until the St. Louis Circuit Court has ruled on the case. <br />The property, owner has been offered assistance and <br />guidance by a number of groups in the community includ- <br />ing Historic Florissant who offered to properly reside the <br />house free of charge in exchange for a 15 -year easement. <br />Because the property owner was not informed that the <br />property was located in an historic district at the time of <br />property settlement, as required by local law, the local <br />title company has also offered funds to bring the property <br />into conformance with the guidelines. <br />Fortunately, according to former Commission Chair- <br />man Rosemary Davison, the controversy "has not had <br />damaging repercussions" on surrounding communities <br />considering the adoption of local historic district ordi- <br />nances. <br />She stated that the lesson learned by the community <br />which should be heeded by others is that "you have to <br />keep reminding people of the importance of the landmark <br />district, especially new people who are not aware of the <br />stability that the regulations bring to the neighborhood." <br />She emphasized that even in well established historic <br />districts, "you can never let up on public education." <br />Other communities facing major controversies can <br />team from the Florissant experience. "In the beginning it <br />was not taken seriously enough," according to Davison, "a <br />lot of damage was done by the news media before we were <br />able to rally the supporters of the district." <br />The controversy continues in the community. The <br />City Council is considering a change to the ordinance <br />which would allow vinyl siding on landmark structures. <br />The Commission is seeking examples of guidelines or <br />ordinances from communities which have chosen to disal- <br />low the use of vinyl siding on landmark structures. For <br />more information on this case or to send a copy of your <br />guidelines or ordinance, write Chairman Steinbrugh, 406 <br />Rue St. Louis, Florissant, MO 63031. <br />The Comstock <br />Is Not Undermined! <br />Plans for a twenty acre open pit mine to be located in <br />the Silver City area of the Comstock Historic District, <br />Nevada have been turned down by a 4-1 vote by the Lyon <br />County Commissioners. The vote against plans by the <br />Nevex Gold Co., Inc. protects the integrity of this <br />National Historic Landmark. It is the first mining permit <br />ever refused in the history of the County, and perhaps in <br />the State. Larry Wahrenbrock, staff to the Comstock <br />Historic District Commission, and NAPC state rep re- <br />ports, "it is a major step toward protecting the historic <br />district. " The Silver City Residents Association launched <br />a major public education campaign which was a key to the <br />successful outcome. For more information contact Larry <br />at the Comstock Historic District Commission, Box 128, <br />Virginia City, NV 89440. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.