My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 10-07-94
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
RM 10-07-94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 3:52:56 PM
Creation date
10/8/2012 10:43:48 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting - October 7, 1994 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) <br />f. continued... <br />Development Area, subject to satisfactorily <br />resolving the last item on their counter offer. <br />g. Staff report on disposition of property in <br />the Sample -Ewing Development Area. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that the Commission had <br />previously received a proposal from the <br />Firemen's Credit Union to purchase the <br />former Policemen's Federal Credit Union <br />building and move it to Parcel 19 in the <br />Studebaker Corridor, adjacent to the present <br />Policemen's Federal Credit Union. We <br />have subsequently received an offer to <br />purchase the same lot. The offer is from <br />APPA Champion Soft Water Company, Inc. They <br />have offered $30,000 for the lot and propose <br />a 5,000 - 7,500 square foot building to <br />house their offices, retail sales space, <br />warehousing, and proposed water bottling <br />plant. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that there are some issues <br />with the Firemen's Credit Union proposal <br />related to the need to relocate utility lines in <br />a vacated alley. It appears that the proposal <br />from Champion Soft Water does not require <br />the Commission to move those utility lines. <br />Mrs. Kolata suggested that the Commission <br />refer the proposal to the staff for review and <br />recommendation. <br />There was no objection and the proposal was PROPOSAL REFERRED TO STAFF FOR <br />referred to staff for review. REVIEW <br />-24- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.