My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 10-11-91
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
RM 10-11-91
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 4:41:45 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 10:00:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend <br />Regular Me <br />C:1 <br />elog ent Commission <br />- October 11, 1991 <br />a. continuea... <br />MR. DAVIS: We met the surveyor on <br />Wediesday or Thursday this week. He had <br />to do a complete survey of the whole <br />bl because there are no markings <br />there. He said he would have that <br />inf rmation into this office today, which <br />wot* d determine exactly what the square <br />footacre is. <br />M5. HICKEY: That survey was done at the <br />reatiest of this office. <br />M9.IAUBURN: So there will be an answer. <br />MS. HICKEY: That was requested several <br />weelcs ago. I don't know if we'll receive <br />the results today, but it should be soon. <br />MR. IDAVIS: We've had very much difficulty <br />det rmi -ni na the exact dimP.nsions of the <br />MR. HUNT: Some of the confusion may be <br />due to the easement, where Senor Kelly's <br />leased the public right -of -way for <br />restaurant use and put the sidewalk on <br />prrrate property. Again, the Public <br />Hearing is not on the establishment of <br />Fair Market Value, but simply wending <br />the Plan to add the property to the <br />accniisitim list. <br />MS. AUBURN: That's today's action, to <br />arnend the Plan to include the property. <br />The next step will be the appraisals that <br />c in on the property and then the <br />establishment of the Fair Market Value. <br />It's kind of a second step. The tax <br />issue, or what the property is assessed <br />at for tax purposes is not part of our <br />discussion or consideration at all. Nor <br />within our purview. I know that there <br />are citizens who appeal their assessed <br />val tion when they feel it is unfair. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.