My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 02-09-90
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RM 02-09-90
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 5:04:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 2:57:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend 1jedevelopment Carrnmission <br />Regular Meeting - February 9, 1990 <br />6. NEW BUSILNFSS (Cont.) <br />f. continued... <br />and some major change to the facade. We <br />hav also asked that they look at the <br />building systems (heating, air <br />conditioning, and plumbing) and put <br />toe ther some cost estimates. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that the Commission has <br />owned the building for some time and it <br />has been available for sale. There has <br />not been much interest in it to this <br />poi . We think that it is necessary to <br />shcu, how the building could be developed <br />and renovated on a phased basis. We <br />could then use the designs directly or <br />them over to a private developer who <br />coulo put a project together. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that Troyer's fixed fee <br />proposal is $11,300. This is a lower fee <br />than they would usually charge and Troyer <br />would expect to meet with staff and <br />others who could help them make the best <br />use of their time. <br />Mr. Piasecki asked if they would use <br />their previous study as a resource for <br />thio work. Mrs. Kolata responded that <br />she Owpected that they would. <br />Mr. Dondho asked what the difference <br />woull be between this work and the study <br />they did previously. Mrs. Kolata <br />r nded that the former study addressed <br />whet er the building could structurally <br />sup rt its suggested use as the new <br />1 ion for the Northern Indiana <br />Hi rival Museum and whether an atrium <br />be created where the escalators <br />tly are. It also addressed the <br />enviromiental condition of the building. <br />This work will produce an actual proposed <br />design for reuse and address issues such <br />as whether it would be possible to heat <br />only the first two floors and how to <br />impl t a phased development. <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.