Laserfiche WebLink
vii. Evaluation <br />viii. Testing <br />ix. Other evaluation: <br />x. Certified Analysis <br />1. Sample product analysis <br />Z Reference interview and possible sample analysis <br />3. Yedficadon of ingredients. <br />1. The City reserves the right to submit samples of the <br />polyphosphate product to an independent laboratory of <br />the City's choice for chemical, biological, and physical <br />analysis and testing <br />Z Any product which, in the City's opinion, contains <br />hazardous or deleterious substance orfails to comply <br />with these specifications will be disqualified <br />3. The cost of this analysis and testing will be incurred by <br />the vendor with the understanding that a maximum of <br />ten samples peryear will be submitted <br />4. Guaranteed minimum available phosphate percentage <br />as PO4 is to be Eighty Percent (80'A). <br />1. List of data that confi mprodum effect on (a) copper, <br />(b) sequestration <br />Z List ofdata that confirms company' experience in other <br />cities and technical support <br />1. The supplier shall provide a certified chemical analysis <br />of a pyrophosphate product sample taken from the <br />production facilityfrom which he proposes to supply the <br />City of South Bend <br />2. He shall further certtfjâ–º analysis to be representative of <br />the product he proposes to provide the City. <br />xi. Performance Requirements <br />1. When applied at a rate yielding not more than four (4) <br />parrs of pyrophosphate as PO4 to each part of iron and <br />manganese, the product shall be capable ofholding iron <br />and manganese in solution for no fewer than five (S) <br />days at seventy (!O) degrees Fahrenheit in the presence <br />of one-half milligram per liter (O.S mgll) free chlorine <br />