Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend I Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular M ting - October 14, 1988 <br />3. <br />(Cont.) <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Combs, seconded by <br />Mr. Piasecki and carried, the Commission <br />formally approved the claims submitted <br />Sept 26, October 3, and October 10, 1988 <br />and oxxtered checks dated October 1, October <br />7, and October 17, 1988 to be released. Ms. <br />Auburn declared a conflict of interest and <br />voted bresent. <br />4. CCMMUNICM <br />There werE <br />5. OLD BU SINE <br />There <br />6. NEW BU INE <br />a. cogmis <br />Rec. olu <br />to be <br />rel ate <br />redeve <br />De elc <br />I.. rk <br />by <br />no coYmuunications . <br />no old business. <br />. Kolata explained that there are <br />is related to the acquisition and <br />evelopment in Studebaker Corridor for <br />k which needs to be done prior to the <br />e of the bond. The Commission will <br />tiorize this work, paying for it out of <br />er funds, but intends to reimburse <br />se funds with bond proceeds when the <br />:1 is sold. Those costs include such <br />rigs as appraisal and survey work and <br />i.ronmental studies. <br />ri a motion by Mr. Piasecki, seconded <br />!qtr. Combs and unanimously carried, the <br />nission adopted Resolution No. 858 <br />icating its intent to be reimbursed <br />preliminary costs related to the <br />Asition and redevelopment of the <br />iebaker Corridor Development Area or <br />issuance of bonds. <br />-3- <br />• 1 • • Z' V X11 I • f <br />WV • 0I1 Di• •r M 1,• X11 • • ::NI <br />[O•-M- • • •:�- •• <br />THERE WERE NO CONM[JNI=ONS <br />[IILI�IC /• • • / 4� <br />•• i 1 • • •• - X11 - • • • <br />1 1 1 1 � • <br />1 r, X11 • - - - �i 1 n i- • <br />. 11• of • - ia+ • i 1 : • ��- <br />•••- ••' • Si •- Iii •- • •- <br />