My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 08-12-88
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
RM 08-12-88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 2:43:21 PM
Creation date
10/4/2012 10:35:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend <br />Regular Me <br />6. NEW BU <br />d. Co <br />rte! <br />elopment Commission <br />- August 12, 1988 <br />(Cont. ) <br />Mrs. Kolata also noted that there is <br />some disagreement as to the number of <br />pieces of property that need to be <br />sure ved/have title work done. <br />Upon a motion by Ms. Auburn, seconded <br />by . Combs and unanimously carried, <br />the Commission awarded the contract <br />for s=ey work in the Studebaker <br />Corr dor Development Area to Pierce <br />and Associates. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that Abstract and <br />Title submitted a bid for $12,000 for <br />a noccimm of 200 policies. St. Joseph <br />Title bid $100 each for 150 parcels <br />plus $1,000 for a railroad <br />right-of-way search for the line that <br />runs between Indiana and Tutt St. on <br />the east side of Lafayette Blvd. for a <br />total of $16,000. <br />Mrs. Kolata also noted that the title <br />ccmgmy selected to do the title <br />searches is also the company we commit <br />to for the title policy when the <br />propcatty is purchased and resold. <br />Mrs. Kolata noted that we have worked <br />with both companies and are satisfied <br />with their work. She also noted that <br />the work could be divided and awarded <br />to both companies. <br />go <br />were <br />rn expressed a preference for <br />the work. <br />mtz asked if there were any <br />ions to this item being tabled <br />the staff asked for revised <br />als from both companies. There <br />o objections and item 6.e. was <br />-7- <br />, 6161 W3 folk) • YU-11 4110P 40 1 C k i• <br />Y •• •• 1 :• l0I- <br />• -- ••• W11516 - IV •• • • <br />-� • <br />COMMISSION TABLED THE SELECTION <br />OF A COMPANY TO DO TITLE WORK IN <br />THE STUDEBAEER CORRIDOR <br />DEVELOPMENT AREA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.