My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-10-85
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
RM 05-10-85
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 3:28:17 PM
Creation date
10/1/2012 1:08:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sout <br />Regt <br />5. <br />W <br />h Bend <br />Redevelopment Commission <br />.lar Meeting <br />- May 10, 1985 <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />ias no old business. <br />There <br />New Business <br />approval requested for Resolution <br />a. CoTmission <br />No. <br />737 designating the South Bend Central <br />Development <br />Area, declaring the South Bend <br />Ce <br />tral Development Area to be blighted, <br />,a 2=oving <br />a development plan and conditions <br />under <br />which relocation is will be made <br />and <br />establishing an allocation area for <br />purposes <br />of Tax Incremental Financing. <br />Mr. <br />Hunt explained that Resolution No. 737 <br />represents <br />a merger of the three existing <br />Redevelopment <br />areas, East Bank, Monroe Park, <br />and <br />Central Downtown Urban Renewal Area. <br />Si <br />ace 1968 those three areas have been <br />de <br />Tared separate Redevelopment projects. M <br />Hunt <br />stated that this is the first step in t <br />process <br />that would merge those three areas <br />into <br />one Redevelopment area and also expand <br />the <br />areas. <br />The <br />staff recommends that the merger be <br />approved <br />for several reasons. First, all <br />three <br />areas are interrelated both physically <br />and <br />functionally, for example traffic <br />patterns, <br />sale of land, goals and objectives <br />In <br />order to address our needs in 1990 and <br />beyond, <br />in Redevelopment's revitalization ani <br />physical <br />redevelopment efforts in the core o <br />the <br />City, we will need a comprehensive plan <br />that <br />views all three areas as one functional <br />area. <br />Secondly, from an internal management <br />standpoint <br />it is more efficient to have one <br />project <br />area as opposed to three separate <br />project <br />areas in terms of record keeping, <br />filing, <br />accounting and financial aspects. <br />Thirdly, <br />it will allow Redevelopment to merge <br />the <br />corresponding tax increment financing <br />allocation <br />areas. There currently are four <br />separate <br />allocation areas. For those reason; <br />the <br />staff would recommend to the Coninission <br />that <br />the merger and expansion be approved. <br />-3- <br />M <br />ze <br />THERE WAS NO OLD BUSINESS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.