My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 04-23-82
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
RM 04-23-82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 3:56:24 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 2:54:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Mee ing - April 23, 1982 <br />6.) NEW BUJINESS (Continued) <br />Red4vetopment Commt6zion. <br />Most o4 the development which hays taken <br />pta e in the Monroe- Sampte nedeve2opment area <br />and otheA nedevetopment are" within the City <br />has been accompt.,[zhed thfLough the payment o4 <br />pre a it i.ng wages by the co nt ac to us netu fined <br />by he devetopeu of the panticu at pancet of <br />pro etcty. T whotehec tied. y zuppoAt the Rede- <br />vegopment Commisz.ion'z eneoutcagement o4 <br />devetopeu to continue .such wages although <br />.such a tequ.itcement cannot be included in the <br />zpe "�ieatiou bon the sate o4 the pupeAty, <br />I beUeve that thin expness ion o4 the wilt o4 <br />the Commizzion wiU have a poziti.ve impact <br />without causing tegat pnobtems that could act <br />as detevicent to 4ututce development in the <br />Mon e- Sample oAea and otheA redevelopment <br />cvLe . <br />I commend the membetus of the Redevelopment <br />Comm " zion 6o& thei& continued e4�oxt6 on be- <br />halJ o4 the citizens o4 outc community. <br />Sineetceey, <br />S/ <br />Rogetc 0. Paunt <br />Upon a motion by Mr. Donaldson, seconded by <br />Mr. obinson and unanimously carried, Resolution <br />No. 58 was approved. <br />Mr. 4imtz explained that although the Commission <br />did iot have a prevailing wage requirement on the <br />Bloc< 6 land, almost all of the construction <br />then was done paying prevailing wage. <br />Mr. IcMahon stated that the Commission is also <br />reco mending that local labor be used. <br />Ms. kuburn explained that if there is a problem <br />in tie future where prevailing wages are not being <br />adhe ed to in the majority of the construction cases <br />or ff there is a problem with not using local con- <br />trac ors or local employees, the Commission will <br />come back and readdress that issue. There is a <br />nati nal group that is putting pressure on some <br />orga izations nation wide to move away from the <br />prev iling wage rate and also to begin to move <br />-5- <br />COMMISSION APPROVED <br />RESOLUTION #658 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.