Laserfiche WebLink
®CITY OFSOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK <br /> Jessica Pizer of 824 W. Colfax, South Bend, IN stated, I have several concerns about this site <br /> selection, and I have several questions for the Council. I am on the leadership of the Near Westside <br /> Neighborhood organization. The neighborhood was never intended to have a voice or be a partner <br /> in the site selection. As the treasurer, our leadership was informed on June 18, 2019. At that time <br /> the proposal was already on the Area Planning Committee agenda for July 16, 2019 and it was <br /> already on the Council agenda for July 22nd, 2019. So, this was already being pushed through <br /> without any input from the neighborhood. It's concerning. Why is that and can we really trust that <br /> we will be a partner after this? To that end, neighbors have been asking for the supposed scoring <br /> matrix since the end of June. We got it last night at 7:30 p.m., so I'd like to know if the Council <br /> has seen the scoring matrix? I bring this up because some of the information on that matrix is <br /> incorrect. For instance, the West Washington location was given an environmental score of clear, <br /> while the downtown Salvation Army building was given a Caution score. The Salvation Army <br /> building in reference to proximity of downtown South Bend was ranked at not applicable,but most <br /> people would argue that it is in fact in downtown South Bend. If this is the information that is <br /> informing the best site location, then this matrix needs to be reviewed for inaccuracies. That leads <br /> me to ask the Council, has proper due diligence been done for this site location? We've been told <br /> that this is the best location because it's fiscally responsible because the land is free from the City. <br /> 3.5 million dollars to build this building. Is the Council aware that there are and have been cheaper <br /> alternatives?For instance,Saint James Apartments on the corner of Colfax and Eddy recently went <br /> under contract. It's a twenty(20)to twenty-two (22)unit building. The acquisition and renovation <br /> cost will be less than half(1/2) of 3.5 million. The Salvation Army building which the City just <br /> bought has a two (2) story dormitory that would be free, and I have to imagine that the renovation <br /> cost is less than 3.5 million. Mr. Mariani admitted last week that he never wanted to be in the <br /> business of building supportive housing, and his staff admitted to me that they saw no benefit to <br /> the neighbors or neighborhood. So, I ask if they can't support it why should neighbors? <br /> Mr. Alan Larkin of 1016 W. Washington Street, South Bend, IN stated, I'm here to urge that the <br /> zoning change for the so-called permanent supportive housing or PSH project proposed for our <br /> street not be approved. We need to stop this project for a variety of reasons, but I am here to talk <br /> about only one(1) of these. The project as proposed will not work. This is the second such project <br /> that will be developed in the City. The first one (1), although it has been in existence for two (2) <br /> years does not work. Only the bricks and mortar portion for this project was secured. Adequate <br /> funding for operation was not available. Let's not repeat this mistake. Because of this, the <br /> apartments are unsafe for their occupants. ABC News,Channel 57 has noted almost three hundred <br /> (300) police calls from the project over it's first two (2) years. A heroin ring has been uncovered <br /> as well as rampant drug deals and some physical attacks. Some people from the Rum Village <br /> neighborhood near the Oliver Apartments have reported an increase in drug trafficking and <br /> prostitution in the area. It is important to review reports like this skeptically. We shouldn't expect <br /> this difficult population to just settle down and lead more stable lives in a short period of time. As <br /> citizens we have the right to expect due diligence from our government. The charges are serious <br /> and should be investigated. Let's not eagerly replicate something that is a proven problem. For my <br /> own part I have done a couple of things. I spent a very sad weekend reading about homelessness <br /> in America and permanent supportive housing. I learned that we have a serious homeless problem <br /> Nationwide, we must do something about it, and PSH (Permanent Supportive Housing) is a <br /> promising idea. I then contacted a friend of mine who is a local homeless advocate to tell me about <br /> her take on the Oliver and now the new proposal. What she wrote shocked me. I will conclude my <br /> remarks by sharing an excerpt with this committee. Her words,permanent supportive housing PSH <br /> EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT <br /> 455 County-City Building 1227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f 574.235.9173 TTD574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov <br /> 9 <br />