My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-15-81
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
RM 05-15-81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:04:30 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 1:06:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting - May 15, 1981 <br />6. NEW BU�INESS (continued) <br />c. con1tinued... <br />obsolesence, substandard buildings or other factors <br />which have impaired values or prevent a normal de- <br />velopment of property or use of property. <br />Mr. Wolvas explained that the property was an old gas <br />station and in a bad area. At the time he bought the <br />building the City Council had no definite procedures <br />for tax abatement. They had to go ahead with their <br />plans and complied with everything as far as con- <br />struction, zoning, etc. Mr. Wolvas stated that down- <br />town South Bend needs small business and they need <br />every bit of help they can get. Mr. Wolvas hoped <br />the Commission would consider the fact that the City <br />Council had no procedures and would like tax abate- <br />Mr. McMahon explained that there has been some con- <br />fusion between the Commission and the Council with <br />respect to ground rules for tax abatement; however, <br />the application process has been in place for well <br />ov r a year. He emphasized that the improvements <br />are very beneficial, but the staff does not feel <br />the building qualifies for tax abatement. <br />Ms. Auburn stated she felt this type of situation <br />was frustrating because we have not looked at in- <br />novative and alternative ways to finance and to <br />support small business in the community. Also, one <br />of the problems with the tax abatement issue is the <br />fin ncial situation with the city right now, and <br />the realization that what we are doing is reducing <br />fut re income for the city. <br />On iiotion made by Mr. Cira, seconded by Mr. Donald- <br />son and unanimously carried, the Commission approved <br />the staff report to not recommend tax abatement for <br />Ale ander's Jewelry. <br />d. Commission approval requested Executive Director to <br />execute Proclaimer Certificate No. 2,'establishin <br />the fair market vdlue for property to'be acquired <br />in the Monroe - Sample Development Area. <br />Mr. McMahon explained that the Monroe - Sample Pro - <br />claimer No. 2 establishes values in the Monroe - <br />Sa ole area <br />COMMISSION RECOMMENDS TAX <br />ABATEMENT NOT BE APPROVED <br />FOR 322 N. MICHIGAN STREET <br />(ALEXANDER'S JEWELRY) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.