Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting - March 20, 1981 <br />4. COMMUNICATIONS (continued) <br />We do believe the plan as finalized has merit and will <br />bring long awaited relief to many residents of that area. <br />Howeve , our concerns as a business in the area are not <br />being best served by the plan. The ability of Max's <br />GrocerL to continue to operate as a for- profit retail <br />grocer is directly related to a stable market area. For LETTER FROM INTER -CITY <br />the p& Et five of the nine years we have operated, we have ENTERPRISE CORP. TO MR. <br />witnes ed a substantial erosion of that market area. The PATRICK M. MCMAHON WAS <br />remova of seventy housing units in the remaining market RECEIVED AND PLACED ON <br />area w uld cause us to go under. FILE (RE: MONROE- SAMPLE <br />DEVELOPMENT AREA) <br />Therefore, we are requesting that Redevelopment Commission <br />include Max's Grocery in your Acquisition Plan for the area. <br />Further, we are requesting a meeting immediately with you in <br />order to further discuss our request. <br />Thank �ou for the consideration, we shall await your response. <br />5. PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br />Sincerely, <br />S/ <br />Harry Nye, President <br />S/ <br />Silas West, Vice President <br />S/ <br />Lee C. McKnight, Secretary /Treasurer <br />Mr. Ni tz declared the meeting open concerning the Public <br />Hearing on the Monroe- Sample Area and Commission Resolu- <br />tion ND. 633. PUBLIC HEARING ON MONROE- <br />Mr. McMahon presented the Commission with the following SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AREA <br />items and asked that they be entered into the record: <br />Original Notice of Public Hearing; Affidavit of Proof of <br />Publication from the South Bend Tribune and Tri- County <br />News; 4ffidavit that notice was delivered to Area Plan <br />Commission, Board of Public Works, Board of Zoning Appeals, <br />Building Department, Park Department, and that notice was <br />posted on the bulletin board of the Board of Public Works; <br />Area P an Commission Resolution No. 56; Common Council <br />Resolu ion No. 868 -81; and a copy of Redevelopment Commis- <br />sion R solution No. 633 and a copy of the Monroe - Sample <br />Development Plan. <br />5 <br />